Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider the following family of measures on $(\mathbb R,\mathcal B(\mathbb R))$: $$ K_x(A) = \begin{cases} \int\limits_A \frac{1}{|x|\sqrt{2\pi}}\mathrm e^{-y^2/2x^2}\,dy&,\text{ if }x\neq 0, \\ I_{A}(0)&,\text{ if }x = 0. \end{cases} $$ where $I_A(t)$ is an indicator (characteristic) function of the set $A$. I wonder if it is possible to find a measure $\mu$ such that $\mu>>K_x$ for any $x$ (i.e. if $\mu(A) = 0$ then $K_x(A) = 0$) and $$ \xi(x,y):=\frac{\mathrm dK_x}{\mathrm d\mu} $$ is a continuous function of $(x,y)$.

Of course, we cannot take $\mu$ to be Lebesgue measure since $K_0(\{0\}) = 1$ and the only problem is in this point. Still I am not sure that there are no such measures at all, but I didn't fund an example or prove that there are no an example.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

A continuous density does not exist.

From the relation $\int_A \xi(0,y)\, \mu(dy)=\delta_0(A)=0$ for any Borel set $A$ that doesn't include the origin, we find that $\xi(0,y)=0$ $\mu$-almost everywhere on ${\mathbb R}\setminus\{0\}$.

Since $K_1\ll\mu$, this implies $\xi(0,y)=0$ $K_1$-almost everywhere on ${\mathbb R}\setminus\{0\}$. But $K_1$ has full support on ${\mathbb R}$ so, by continuity, we get $\xi(0,y)=0$ for all $y\in {\mathbb R}$.

But this contradicts $1=\int_{\mathbb R} \xi(0,y)\, \mu(dy)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
thank you, that's a nice proof. – Ilya Aug 10 '11 at 15:49
Glad to help out. – Byron Schmuland Aug 10 '11 at 18:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.