Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There are three subquestions. (a) Find $f(x) = \lim f_n(x)$

The limit $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}f_n(x) = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x}{n} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}x * \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} = 0.$

(b) Determine whether $f_n \rightarrow f$ uniformly on $[0,1].$

Let $\epsilon >0$ and $N=\frac{1}{\epsilon}.$ Then, $\forall n > N = \frac{1}{\epsilon} \Rightarrow \epsilon > \frac{x}{n}.$

The question that I have problem on is the third one. The following is what I did but I am not sure if it is correct. (c) Determine whether $f_n \rightarrow f$ uniformly on $[0,\infty).$

For $\epsilon > 0 $, consider the function when $x = \epsilon*n.$ Then, $\forall n > N \Rightarrow \left| \frac{x}{n} \right| = \left| \frac{\epsilon*n}{n} \right| = \epsilon, $ which implies that the sequence of function is not uniformly continuous on the gvien interval.

The reason I am confusing on the third one is because of the following theorem. Any comment??

share|improve this question
    
What is the theorem you mentioned in the last sentence? –  John Nov 11 '13 at 2:15
    
your reasoning is right, but the explaining needs to be clarified. in particular you cannot set $x=\epsilon*n$, and then quantify other $n$: it is the other way around. –  Denis Nov 11 '13 at 2:23
    
@John never mind about that theorem...thanks –  eChung00 Nov 11 '13 at 2:50
    
@dkuper What if I set $\epsilon$ equal to some value and prove it?? Is it ok?? –  eChung00 Nov 11 '13 at 2:51
    
Here is an intuitive way to think of it -- the larger x is the larger n has to be to drag x/n down towards 0. So the choice of N where for all n > N $|f_n| < \epsilon$ depends on x. So the convergence cannot be uniform if x is unbounded. Can you cast that into nice mathematical language? –  Betty Mock Nov 11 '13 at 3:45
show 2 more comments

1 Answer

up vote 0 down vote accepted

To know what to prove, look at the negation of uniform continuity:

$\exists\epsilon>0,\forall N,\exists x,\exists n\geq N,f_n(x)>\epsilon$.

It means that you can choose $\epsilon$ as a constant, and that $x$ is allowed to depend on $\epsilon$ and $N$.

So you made the right choice with $x=N*\epsilon$, but you can even fix $\epsilon$ to 1. Then taking $n=N+1$ works.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.