Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I don't have issues with doing integration problems, but occasionally I see the solution changing the limits of integration whenever a $u$-substitution is done.

I obviously don't have a problem doing this, and I just recently noticed my book doing this under the chapter involving "area of surface of revolution."

My question is did I develop a bad habit by never changing the limits of integration, or is it a best practice to always change limits of integration?

My teacher said on a test, and in general, if we do not change the limits of integration then we should be signifying this by labeling our limits of integration $x=$ lower-limit and $x=$upper-limit.


After further investigation, my confusion is because of the two below equations:

Find the exact area of the surface obtained by rotating the curve about the x-axis $$y=\sqrt{1+4x}, 1\le x\le 5$$

The limits of integration were changed in the solution to this problem.

The given curve is rotated about the y-axis. Find the area of the resulting surface. $$y=x^\frac{1}{3}, 1\le y \le 2$$

The limits of integration were NOT changed in the solution to this problem.

share|cite|improve this question
If you never got a result wrong by not changing the limits of integration, you should gamble, gamble a lot. – Git Gud Nov 9 '13 at 21:12
Your teacher is right, forgetting about changing the limits of integration is a frequent source of error. You usually have two choices: (i) Find an antiderivative in terms of $u$, replace $u$ by what it is in terms of $x$, then use the old limits or (ii) Put the limits in terms of $u$, and never go back to $x$. Do one or the other, don't "mix." In general I prefer (ii). Your teacher's advice, writing $x=a$ or $u=c$ will help you keep track, and will prevent error. – André Nicolas Nov 9 '13 at 21:15
@GitGud that's exactly what prompted this question. I got a result that was different than the solution, but I'm not sure if it is wrong. The only difference is that I didn't change my limits of integration. – free_mind Nov 9 '13 at 21:18
@inquisitor It is wrong in general. See this. – Git Gud Nov 9 '13 at 21:19
@inquisitor : There are some situations in which changing the bounds is not optional. See my answer below. – Michael Hardy Nov 9 '13 at 21:33
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Sometimes we are doing an indefinite integral by $u$-substitution, and then the form of integral involving $u$ is easily converted back into $x$ or whatever the original variable was at the end of the process.

However when a definite integral is involved, you have a choice of either converting the limits of integration from (say) $x$ limits to $u$ limits, or considering the $u$-substitution as a means to obtaining the final indefinite integral in terms of $x$ and using the original limits of integration.

The former has the advantage of skipping the substitution back into $x$, but at the cost of figuring out how to change the limits of integration into terms of $u$. This was a bad habit you learned, or more precisely, a useful habit you failed to learn. Converting the limits from $x$ to $u$ is ordinarily just a matter of using the $x$ limits in the expression for $u$ in terms of $x$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for your answer. What troubles me is early in our learning integration, the book seemed to indicate a choice as to using the substituted limits of integration, so I just did what I learned first. I'm going to try and break myself out of this habit. – free_mind Nov 9 '13 at 21:24

Suppose you have $$ \int_0^{\pi/4} \left(\tan x\right)^3 \Big(\sec^2 x\,dx\Big) $$ (where you should take the $\Big($Big parentheses$\Big)$ as a hint about what $u$ should be), then you can write \begin{align} u & = \tan x \\ du & = \sec^2 x\,dx \end{align} and then the integral is $$ \int_{x=0}^{x=\pi/4} u^3 \,du = \left[\frac{u^4}4\right]_{x=0}^{x=\pi/4} = \left[\frac{(\tan x)^4}{4}\right]_0^{\pi/4} = \frac14. $$ In this case, you could say changing the bounds is optional, although it speeds things up and simplifies things: $$ \int_0^1 u^3\,du = \left[ \frac{u^4}{4}\right]_0^1 = \frac14. $$

But there are situations in which you'll get nowhere if you don't change the bounds. For example, the Beta function is defined by $$ B(\alpha,\beta) = \int_0^1 x^{\alpha-1} (1-x)^{\beta-1}\,dx. $$ So suppose we have $$ \int_0^5 x^{\alpha-1}(5-x)^{\beta-1} \,dx. $$ (I've seen integrals like this arising in statistics problems.) Then let \begin{align} u & = x/5, \\ du & = dx/5. \end{align} The integral then becomes $$ \int_0^1 (5u)^{\alpha-1} (5-5u)^{\beta-1}\,\Big(5\,du\Big) = 5^3 \int_0^1 u^{\alpha-1}(1-u)^{\beta-1}\, du = 125 B(\alpha,\beta). $$

Without changing the bounds, how could one recognize this as being the Beta function?

share|cite|improve this answer

The idea is that the limits of the integral are in terms of the variable of integration. So take for instance: $$ \int_{0}^{2\pi}\cos(x)e^{\cos x}dx $$ If we wanted to do a $u$-substitution we might call $u=\cos(x)$ with $du=-\sin(x)dx$; therefore, $$ \int_{0}^{2\pi}\cos(x)e^{\cos x}dx=\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{e^{u}u}{\sqrt{1-u^2}}du $$ You'll notice that if I had left the limits of integration as $0$ to $2\pi$, then the two inntegrals would be different. Remember, the integration variable is a dummy variable, so what you use for it is completely irrelevant. Thus, $$ \int_{0}^{2\pi}\cos(x)e^{\cos x}dx=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\cos(u)e^{\cos u}du $$ The way you decide how the limits change is by evaluating the parameterization equation. So for the above example $u(x)=\cos(x)$ so $u(0)=1$ and $u(2\pi)=-1$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.