Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A$ be a one-dimensional Noetherian domain. Let $K$ be its field of fractions. Let $B$ be the integral closure of $A$ in $K$. Suppose $B$ is a finitely generated $A$-module. It is well-known that $B$ is a Dedekind domain. Let $\mathfrak{f} = \{a \in A; aB \subset A\}$. Let $I$ be an ideal of $A$. If $I + \mathfrak{f} = A$, we call $I$ regular. I came up with the following proposition.

Proposition Let $I$ be a regular ideal of $A$. Then the canonical homomorphism $A/I \rightarrow B/IB$ is an isomorphism.

Outline of my proof I used the result of this question.

My question How do you prove the proposition? I would like to know other proofs based on different ideas from mine. I welcome you to provide as many different proofs as possible. I wish the proofs would be detailed enough for people who have basic knowledge of introductory algebraic number theory to be able to understand.

share|cite|improve this question
I noticed that someone serially upvoted for my questions. While I appreciate them, I would like to point out that serial upvotes are automatically reversed by the system. – Makoto Kato Nov 27 '13 at 7:07
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Since $I + \mathfrak{f} = A$ one can write $1=\alpha+a$ with $\alpha\in I$ and $aB\subset A$. Then, for $b\in B$ we have $b=\alpha b+ab$, so $b-ab\in IB$, $ab\in A$, proving that the canonical $A/I\to B/IB$ is surjective. In order to show that it is injective we have to prove that $IB\cap A=I$: let $x\in IB\cap A$; then $x=\alpha x+ax$ with $\alpha x\in I$ (since $\alpha \in I$ and $x\in A$) and $ax\in I$ (since $aB\subset A$ implies $a(IB)\subset I$).

share|cite|improve this answer
This is nice. Thanks. – Makoto Kato Nov 7 '13 at 11:00
I accepted your answer. However, it does not mean the question is over. I always welcome anyone who would post other proofs of the proposition. – Makoto Kato Nov 7 '13 at 22:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.