Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The question is from an exercise in Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra and its Applications:

Suppose the only eigenvectors of $A$ are multiples of $x=(1,0,0)$. True or false:

(a) $A$ is not invertible.

(b) $A$ has a repeated eigenvalue.

(c) $A$ is not diagonalizable.

(b) has to be true. Since if $A$ has different eigenvalues, then there will be linear independent eigenvectors.

One example that I can come up with for which (a) and (c) are true is $$A=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0& 1& 0 \\ 0& 0 & 1 \\ 0& 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right)$$

Here are my questions:

  • Are there any counterexamples for (a) and (c)?
  • What's the underlying picture of this problem?
share|cite|improve this question
The underlying picture is the theory of Jordan normal form. Are you familiar with it? – Qiaochu Yuan Aug 2 '11 at 20:21
If your field is not algebraically closed, it may well be the case that the only eigenvectors are the non-zero multiples of $(1,0,0)$ and there is no repeated eigenvalue: for example, over $\mathbb R$ the characteristic polynomial could be $x(x^2+1)$. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Aug 2 '11 at 20:22
I don't understand... you have correctly pointed out (b) must be true, so how could you have a counterexample to (b), let alone to (a) and (b)? – Arturo Magidin Aug 2 '11 at 20:22
@Arturo: Ah, that's my silly typo. Corrected. Thanks. – Jack Aug 2 '11 at 20:24
@Jack: There can be no counterexample to (c), because if the matrix is diagonalizable then it necessarily must have a basis of eigenvectors, hence at least three linearly independent eigenvectors, hence not every eigenvector is a scalar multiple of $(1,0,0)$. – Arturo Magidin Aug 2 '11 at 20:29
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Over the complex numbers, you must have a matrix that is similar to $$\left(\begin{array}{ccc} \lambda & 1 & 0\\ 0 & \lambda & 1\\ 0 & 0 & \lambda \end{array}\right),$$ where $\lambda$ is the unique eigenvalue; this follows form the theory of Jordan Canonical forms.

Over a non-algebraically closed field, you have two possibilities: either a matrix similar to one as above (if the characteristic polynomial splits as a perfect cube), or else a matrix similar to one of the form $$\left(\begin{array}{ccr} \lambda & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -a\\ 0 & 1 & -b \end{array}\right),$$ where $\lambda$ is the eigenvalue, and $x^2 + bx + a$ is an irreducible quadratic polynomial over your field; this follows from the theory of Rational Canonical Forms.

In either case, the matrix is invertible if and only if $\lambda\neq 0$, and the matrix is never diagonalizable.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1. Thanks for you answer. I haven't learned the Rational Canonical Forms before. I guess it can be found in some advanced linear algebra book? – Jack Aug 2 '11 at 20:35
@Jack: Well, it's in Friedberg, Insel, and Spence, at least. – Arturo Magidin Aug 2 '11 at 20:36
Also in Artin! (Ch. 12) – Ben Blum-Smith Aug 5 '11 at 11:28

In my elementary linear algebra class we did many problems like this without the Jordan Normal Form, etc, which I picked up later. So I will try to give a simpler explanation.

a) Recall that a matrix is non-invertible if it has nonzero vectors in its null space. This also means that those vectors are eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalue $0$. So what if $\text{null } A =\text{span }{(1,0,0)}?$ This is the case where an eigenvalue of $A$ is 0. However, you CANNOT conclude this from your givens, because you have no hypothesis on what the eigenvalue of $\text{span }{(1,0,0)}$ is.

b) Now, $A$ is a linear operator on $\mathbb R^3.$ This means that $A$ has a real eigenvalue, because the characteristic equation of $A$ is a cubic, so it has a real root. What if two of those roots were imaginary? Then $A$ would have its one-dimensional eigenspace, as given, but would not have a repeated eigenvalue.

c) This one is true. A matrix is diagonalizable if and only if has $n$ linearly independent eigenvectors, where $n$ is the dimension of the vector space it operates on. This means you need $3$ linearly independent eigenvectors where you only have one! An easy to remember this is that, to diagonalize a matrix $A$, you need to be able to write it as $A = PDP^{-1},$ where $P$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix whose columns consist of eigenvectors of $A.$ Remember that $P$ is invertible if and only if it has linearly independent columns, and you are done.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.