Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Find the minimum value of $(\frac{x^n}{n} + \frac{1}{x})$ for $n \ge 4$.

One possible approach could be by first writing $$ \left(\frac{x^n}{n} + \frac{1} {x}\right) = \left( \frac{x^n}{n} + \frac{1}{nx} + \frac{1}{nx}+ \frac{1}{nx} + \text{upto n terms}\right) $$ then using the property $\mathrm{AM} \ge \mathrm{GM}$, we would get $$\left(\frac{x^n}{n} + \frac{1}{nx} + \frac{1}{nx}+ \frac{1}{nx}+ \text{upto }n \text{ terms}\right) = \left( \frac{x^n}{n} + \frac{1}{x} \right) \ge \frac{n+1}{n}$$ But this does not hold good for negative $x$; I am inquisitive to know how to approach for that case?

share|cite|improve this question
Approaching $x=0$ from the left gives a vertical asymptote going to negative infinity, implying there will never be a global minimum. I take it you're looking for local minima then? Are you familiar with the method of using derivatives to find local extrema? – anon Aug 1 '11 at 23:30
yes,I am familiar of using the derivatives for finding the maxima and minima,however I got mired while using it here :/ – VelvetThunder Aug 1 '11 at 23:41
You shouldn't have come across any problems. Can you tell me what the derivative of $x^n/n+1/x$ is? – anon Aug 1 '11 at 23:44
Ehhh... my fault,I somehow assumed as the minimum point as the minimum value :/,thanks a lot,however this A.M,G.M approach seems a bit more intuitive to me :) – VelvetThunder Aug 1 '11 at 23:59
The AM-GM approach is indeed nice. But the calculus deals just as easily, for example, with the minimum value of $$\frac{x^{\sqrt{2}}}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{1}{x}$$ for positive $x$. – André Nicolas Aug 2 '11 at 0:39
up vote 2 down vote accepted

For $x \lt 0$ there is no minimum. As $x$ gets very close to $0$, the $\frac{1}{x}$ term gets very large and negative, faster than the $\frac{x^n}{n}$ can get positive (assuming $n$ is even-if $n$ is odd this term is negative, too).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks,I should have taken the limit first,one more doubt,how $n \ge 4$ is justified here?I mean what is the problem with $n=3$? – VelvetThunder Aug 1 '11 at 23:37
@FoolForMath: There is no problem. The argument is the same no matter what natural number $n$ is. I encourage you to test and see for yourself using WolframAlpha. – anon Aug 1 '11 at 23:42
@ anon:Yes,I noticed that but I was just wondering why the problem setter mentioned it explicitly. – VelvetThunder Aug 1 '11 at 23:45
@FoolForMath: Doesn't look like there's any meaningful reason to set $n\ge 4$. Also, you might want to repair your spacebar key. :) – anon Aug 1 '11 at 23:48
It's a joke! You're supposed to put spaces after punctuation. No biggie. – anon Aug 1 '11 at 23:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.