Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $x\in \mathbb R^n$ and $B_\varepsilon = \{x:\|x\|\leq \varepsilon\}$. In the proof of the solution for a Poisson equation $$ -\Delta u = f $$ there is written that $$ \int\limits_{B_\varepsilon}|\Phi(y)|dy\leq C\varepsilon^2 $$ for $n\geq 3$. Here $\Phi(y)$ is a fundamental solution of Laplace equation. Since $\Phi(y) = k |y|^{2-n}$ I used to think that for $n>4$ the integral will diverge since $\int\limits_{0}^\varepsilon y^{-2}dy = \infty$. Do I have the wrong reasoning?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

The fundamental solution of the Laplace equation is $|y|^{2-n}$ (exponent $2-n$, not $n-2$). In your last integral, you're missing the factor from the Jacobian determinant. The correct integral is

$$\iint_0^\epsilon|y|^{2-n}|y|^{n-1}\mathrm d|y|\mathrm d\Omega=\iint_0^\epsilon|y|\mathrm d|y|\mathrm d\Omega= \frac12\epsilon^2\int\mathrm d\Omega=C\epsilon^2\;.$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks. $n-2$ was a misprint – Ilya Aug 1 '11 at 15:12
Does it informally mean that it higher dimensions the area of $B_\varepsilon$ decreases faster then $y^{2-n}$ grows? – Ilya Aug 1 '11 at 15:22
If by "area" you mean "surface area", yes, the surface area of $B_\epsilon$ is proportional to $\epsilon^{n-1}$, which is one factor of $\epsilon$ more in the numerator than $y^{2-n}$ has in the denominator. – joriki Aug 1 '11 at 15:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.