Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Frenet frame formula says that the first derivation of the equation $q(t)$ is my view:

$$q'(t) = \verb|vec_view|$$

the cross product of derivation one and two $q' \times q''$ is my binominal vector

In some formulary, equations are only derived like $$\verb|vec_view| = q',$$ $$\verb|Binominal vector| = q' \times q''.$$

In some other their are divided through the normal vector
$$\verb|Binominal vector| = \frac{q'}{\Vert q'\Vert} \times \frac{q''}{\Vert q''\Vert}.$$

I am not sure why some formularies are not dividing. In my opinion the formulary with $$\verb|vec_view| = \frac{q'}{\Vert q'\Vert}$$ is the right one, because I'll get a normalized vector.

Am I right ?

share|improve this question
    
thanks for formatting Theo :) –  RenHoek Aug 1 '11 at 10:46
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I don't know the programming background to your question; it's possible that in whatever applications are being considered, normalization of all the Frénet-Serret vectors isn't needed, so that as long as $q$ is already normalized with $\|\dot{q}\|=\|T\|=1$ (i.e. $q$ has natural parametrization), one can observe that $\ddot{q}$ is parallel to the normal vector $N=\dot{T}/\|\dot{T}\|=\ddot{q}/\|\ddot{q}\|$ and thus $\dot{q}\times\ddot{q}$ is parallel to the binormal vector $B=T\times N$. However, these do not really make up the Frénet-Serret moving frame according to its definition, but rather an augmented variation that might be in place because of outside considerations. You are correct that the true Frénet-Serret frame, by definition, is fully normalized, $\|T\|=\|N\|=\|B\|=1$. If normalization is, in fact, needed for whatever purposes are at hand in your context, then there will be potentially serious problems with failing to normalize. Moreover, if $q$ isn't naturally parametrized (according to its arclength), then the resulting vectors won't even be parallel to the vectors from the true frame, making even bigger problems.

(Also, to nitpick: it's "binormal" instead of "binominal," and I don't even think "formulary" is a real word in mathematics - it's a pharmaceutical list - though perhaps you're just being kooky on the latter term.)

share|improve this answer
    
The "formulary" is my goof. There was "formular" in the original question, which I never read in English before (in German it means "form" as in "a printed document with blank spaces for information to be inserted"), and an all-too-quick glance at my dictionary revealed formulary as an existent word meaning "a collection of formulas...". I should have read further "...or set forms, esp. for use in religious ceremonies." :) –  t.b. Aug 1 '11 at 13:44
    
@Theo: Oh ho ho, gotcha. –  anon Aug 1 '11 at 14:13
    
in german it's "Formel" !!! see : dict.cc/?s=formel –  RenHoek Aug 1 '11 at 14:15
    
@anon sorry for my bad english. i am from germany and mixed it up :) –  RenHoek Aug 1 '11 at 14:21
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.