Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am working on tsitiklis probability book. and there is this solved example in the book which i cannot understand. Please

A conservative design team, call it C, and an innovative design team, call it N, are asked to separately design a new product within a month. From past experience we know that: (a) The probability that team C is successful is 2/3. (b) The probability that team N is successful is 1/2. (c) The probability that at least one team is successful is 3/4. Assuming that exactly one successful design is produced, what is the probability that it was designed by team N?

Then it goes one and states:

There are four possible outcomes here, corresponding to the four combinations of success and failure of the two teams: SS: both succeed, FF: both fail, SF: C succeeds, N fails, FS: C fails, N succeeds.

It further states:

We were given that the probabilities of these outcomes satisfy:

P(SS) + P(SF) = 2/3 , P(SS) + P(FS) =1/2. P(SS) + P(SF) + P(FS) =3/4.

and from these relations, together with the normalization equation P(SS) + P(SF) + P(FS) + P(FF) = 1

we can obtain the probabilities of individual outcomes

P(SS)= 5/12, P(SF)=1/4, P(FS)=1/12, P(FF)=1/4.

=----------------

my question is how does he do this ? and i don't get it that

P(SS) + P(SF) + P(FS) =3/4. is given ? how does he compute this ?

From the question, we can only infer that P(SF) = 2/3 and that P(FS) =1/2.

I don't get it how he infers that P(SS) + P(SF) = 2/3

Any advise ? And then i just don't get it how he computes

P(FS) = 1/12 etc...


share|improve this question
    
He stated at least one team successful has probability 3/4. Isn't that just P(SS)+P(SF)+P(FS) ? –  Raskolnikov Oct 27 '13 at 6:59
    
actually in his proposed solution he gives all three eqns ... additionally, i completely agree that the only bit of information matching a correct equation is P(SS)+P(SF)+P(FS)=3/4. how does he get the other ones ? –  Richard Oct 27 '13 at 8:08

1 Answer 1

You have "(a) The probability that team C is successful is 2/3." This does not tell you anything about Team I.

So you might write it as something like $\Pr(S?) = \frac23$ or as $\Pr(SS) + \Pr(SF) = \frac23$.

You also have "(c) The probability that at least one team is successful is 3/4."

You might write this as something like $\Pr(S? \text{ or }?S) = \frac34$ or $\Pr(SS) + \Pr(SF) + \Pr(FS) = \frac34$.

Combining these two gives $\Pr(FS) = \frac34- \frac23 = \frac{1}{12}$ and you can find the others in a similar way, as you also have $\Pr(SS) + \Pr(SF) + \Pr(FS) + \Pr(FF) = 1$ and so four simultaneous equations in four unknowns.

share|improve this answer
    
rite is rong and I do not know what P(s) stands for either. The probability that Team C is successful whether or not Team N is successful is $\frac23$ and I have written this as $\Pr(SS)+\Pr(SF)=\Pr(S?)$. Similarly the probability that Team N is successful whether or not Team C is successful is $\frac12$ and I have written this as $\Pr(SS)+\Pr(FS)=\Pr(?S)$. There is no independence here. –  Henry Oct 28 '13 at 1:30
    
but these events (SS) and SF are mutually exclusive ? obviously. I thought independence kicks in since SS means Team C successful intersection Team N successful. Is this incorrect ? So, P(S_c S_n) = P(s_c) \times p(s_n). P(S_c) = probability that team C is successful. p(s_n) probability that team N is successful. –  Richard Oct 28 '13 at 2:35
    
Your changes to notation are slightly confusing, but independence would require $\Pr(S_c \text{ and } S_n) = \Pr(S_c ) \times \Pr(S_n)$. That is not true here since $\frac{5}{12} \not = \frac{2}{3} \times \frac{1}{2}$ –  Henry Oct 28 '13 at 12:25

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.