Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I faced a problem to understand the proof of the following theorem from the book "algebraic topology by satya deo".

If $F\colon X\to Y$ be a homotopy between two maps $ f,g\colon X\to Y $. Let $x_0\in X$ and $\sigma\colon I\to Y$ be the path joining $f(x_0)$ and $g(x_0)$ defined by $\sigma(t)=F(x_0,t)$. Then the triangle of induced homomorphisms is commutative i.e. ($\sigma_\#)\circ(f_\#)=g_\#$.

Also, if $f\colon X\to Y$ is homotopic to a constant map $C\colon X\to Y$,then the induced homomorphism $f_\#\colon\pi_1(X,x_0)\to \pi_1(Y,f(x_0))$ is the zero map.

proof:-
first part

Here I have only one problem in the first line of the theorem as author writes
Let $\alpha$ be a loop in $X$ based at $X_0$.then we know that
$$(\sigma_\#)\circ(f_\#)[\alpha]=\sigma_\#[f\circ\alpha] \\ =[\sigma^{-1}*(f\circ\alpha)*\sigma ]$$

My question is how did he write $\sigma _\#[f\circ\alpha] =[\sigma^{-1}*(f\circ \alpha) * \sigma] $ in the 2nd line instead of $[\sigma \circ f\circ\alpha]$ what he has done in the first line.

Can someone explain me please how did this happen.

second part

here he writes that "in the commutative triangle $\sigma_\#$ is isomorphism and $C_\#\colon\pi_1(X,x_0)\to \pi_1(Y,y_0)$ is a trivial map". Here both the logic I did not understand at all.

Will someone explain me elaborately please. I am new to this subject.

Thanks for your time

share|cite|improve this question
    
I hope you don't mind. I cleaned up the notation. – Dan Rust Oct 24 '13 at 19:43

Regarding the first part, it is a little unfortunate that the same notation is used for $f_\#$ and $\sigma_\#$, since those are different types of induced maps.

We have $f\colon X \to Y$, and of course $f$ induces a map of the loop spaces $\tilde{f} \colon \Omega(X,x_0)\to \Omega(Y, f(x_0))$ by compostion of a loop with $f$, $\alpha \mapsto f\circ \alpha$. That map $\tilde{f}$ induces a homomorphism of the fundamental groups $f_\# \colon \pi_1(X,x_0) \to \pi_1(Y, f(x_0))$, as you are aware.

$\sigma$ is a path in $Y$, that is, a map $I \to Y$. Of course, $\sigma$ induces in the same way a (rather boring) homomorphism $\sigma_\# \colon \pi_1(I,0) \to \pi_1(Y, f(x_0))$. But that homomorphism couldn't be composed with $f_\#$ (except if $Y = I$ and $f(x_0) = 0$), so that one cannot possibly be meant. Instead, a path in a space induces a map of the loop spaces in its start and end point, respectively, $\hat{\sigma} \colon \Omega(Y, \sigma(0)) \to \Omega(Y,\sigma(1))$, by concatenating paths $\alpha \mapsto \sigma^{-1}\ast \alpha \ast \sigma$, and that induces a homomorphism of the fundamental groups $\sigma' \colon \pi_1(Y,\sigma(0)) \to \pi_1(Y,\sigma(1))$. It is that homomorphism that is used (and also denoted by $\sigma_\#$).

Regarding the second part, $C$ is a constant map, and since $\tilde{C}$ in the notation above is also a constant map, mapping all loops to trivial (constant) loops, the induced homomorphism $C_\#$ is the trivial homomorphism. The homomorphism $\sigma'$ in my notation above, is however an isomorphism between the two fundamental groups, its inverse is induced by the reverse path $\sigma^{-1}$. So since $\sigma' \circ f_\#$ is trivial, and $\sigma'$ is an isomorphism, $f_\#$ itself must be trivial.

share|cite|improve this answer

When I analysed this proof in the 1960s I found it, and the notion of change of base point, could be generalised nicely and this can be found in Chapter 7 of the book Topology and Groupoids (T&G).

The point is that the fundamental group $\pi_1(Y,y)$ is given by homotopy classes rel base point of maps $(S^1,1) \to (Y,y)$. So why not replace $(S^1,1)$, or $(S^n,1)$ for the homotopy group case, by $(X,A)$? It turns out that one needs $(X,A)$ to have the HEP, Homotopy Extension Property, to get an analogous argument. For a fixed map $u: A \to Y$ one writes $[X,Y;u]$ for the homotopy classes rel $A$ of maps $X\to Y$ which extend $u$. A homotopy $\theta: u \to v$ defines a bijection $\theta_\# : [X,Y;u] \to [X,Y;v]$. One can then prove, analogously to the arguments given in the answers on the fundamental group, that a homotopy equivalence $f: Y \to Z$ induces a bijection $$f_*: [X,Y;u] \to [X,Z;fu].$$ This result leads to a gluing theorem for homotopy equivalences, and indeed that was how I discovered it in 1965.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.