Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question is originated from a book by Gaal, (Linear Analysis and Representation Theory). Theorem 7 from section 6, chapter 1 reads as follows, and I quote:

"Theorem 7: Let $A$ be a complex, commutative Banach algebra. Then every regular maximal ideal of $A$ is the kernel of some non-trivial homomorphism $h:A \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ and conversely, the kernel of every h is a regular maximal ideal. The relative identities of I are all mapped by $h$ into $1$."

The proof is straight forward and uses the fact that $I$ being maximal, the quotient $A/I$ is a field, which was proved just before this theorem. The problem is, he then asserts that $A/I$ is topologically isomorphic to $\mathbb{C}$. Couldn't the field properly contain $\mathbb{C}$? For instance, be the completion of the field of quotient complex funcions?

share|improve this question
    
If $I$ is the kernel of a ring homomorphism $A\to\mathbb{C}$, then $A/I$ is (isomorphic to) a subring of $\mathbb{C}$ (a subfield if $I$ is maximal). But it contains $\mathbb{C}$, so… –  egreg Oct 22 '13 at 19:47
    
@egreg There's a subtlety there. There exists a proper subring of $\mathbb{C}$ that is isomorphic to $\mathbb{C}$. –  Zhen Lin Oct 22 '13 at 19:49
    
I think that if the field properly contains $\mathbb C$ you can find an ideal $ I \subset J$ so that $A/J = \mathbb C$. –  N. S. Oct 22 '13 at 19:50
    
@ZhenLin Yes, but here we're talking about homomorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$-algebras. –  egreg Oct 22 '13 at 19:50
    
@egreg how can you say it is a subring of $\mathbb{C}$? couldn't it contain $\mathbb{C}$ properly? –  Henrique Tyrrell Oct 22 '13 at 19:51
show 2 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

This is actually the Gelfand-Mazur theorem. You can see the proof of it in SUNDER, V. S., Functional Analysis: Spectral Theory, theorem 3.2.5. It is stated as below:

Theorem (Gelfand-Mazur theorem): The following conditions on a unital commutative Banach algebra $\mathcal{A}$ are equivalent:

(i) $\mathcal{A}$ is a division algebra - i.e., every non-zero element is invertible; ($\mathcal{A}$ is a field)

(ii) $\mathcal{A}$ is simple - i.e., there exist no proper ideals in $\mathcal{A}$; and

(iii) $\mathcal{A}=\mathbb{C}1_\mathcal{A}$.

You can find the book on Sunder's webpage.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.