Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Find point of intersection and the bisectors of the angles made by line $k$ passing through point $(3, -1)$ with direction vector $-\vec i + 2\vec j$ and line $l$ passing through point $(-2, 5)$ with direction vector $3\vec i - 2j$.

Assuming the lines intersect I went about finding the point of intersection like so,

Direction vector of line $k$ and $l$,

$$m_k = (-1, 2), m_l = (3, -2)$$

Vector equation of line $k$ is,

$$r_k = (3, -1) + \lambda (-1, 2) = (-\lambda + 3, 2 \lambda - 1)$$

And Vector equation of line $l$ is,

$$r_l = (-2, 5) + \mu (3, -2) = (-2 + 3\mu, 5 - 2\mu)$$

At intersection,

$$(-\lambda + 3, 2 \lambda - 1) = (-2 + 3\mu, 5 - 2\mu)$$

Which gives the 2 equations,

$$\lambda + 3\mu = 5$$ $$\lambda + \mu = 3$$

Solving for $\lambda$ and $\mu$ gives,

$\lambda = 2, \mu = 1$

And thus the point of intersection is $(1, 1)$

The next part of the problem is eluding me. I figured that if the quadrilateral formed by the direction vectors was a rhombus/kite, the angle bisectors would be the diagonals ie:- $m_k + m_l$ and $m_k - m_l$. But the magnitude of $m_k$ and $m_l$ are $\sqrt{5}$ and $\sqrt{13}$ respectively. So that idea doesn't work.

How do i find the equation of the bisectors?

As always, thanks for all your help, Much appreciated!

share|cite|improve this question
What are the vector equations of your lines $k$ and $l$ when you normalize the given direction vectors such that they have length $1$? – Christian Blatter Jul 24 '11 at 14:50
@Christian I am not sure how to do normalize to 1. I normalized the vectors to $m_k = \dfrac{-\vec i + 2\vec j}{\sqrt 5}$ and $m_l = \dfrac{3\vec i - 2\vec j}{\sqrt{13}}$ – mathguy80 Jul 24 '11 at 15:26
Your calculation is correct except for the very end; substituting the values you got for $\lambda$ and $\mu$ into vector equations of the lines yields $(1,3)$. (Perhaps you substituted $1$ for $\lambda$ and $2$ for $\mu$ in calculating the $y$ component?) Regarding the bisectors, you should be able to find them like you wrote, using the normalized direction vectors instead of the unnormalized ones. – joriki Jul 24 '11 at 15:47
Your new vectors $m_k=({-1\over\sqrt{5}},{2\over\sqrt{5}})$ and $m_l=\ldots$ have length 1, so they form a kite, as you say. – Christian Blatter Jul 24 '11 at 15:49
@joriki, Yes I messed that up at the very end. I understand now what Christian was saying about normalize to 1. I was thinking of the magnitude of the direction vector not the unit direction vector. – mathguy80 Jul 24 '11 at 15:56
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Adding the answer from the comments to close this question.

The point of intersection is $(1, 3)$. The unit direction vectors then are,

$$ \begin{align} m_k &= \dfrac{\vec m_k}{|m_k|} &= \dfrac{-\vec i + 2\vec j}{\sqrt 5} \\ m_l &= \dfrac{\vec m_l}{|m_l|} &= \dfrac{3\vec i - 2\vec j}{\sqrt{13}} \end{align} $$

Then the quadrilateral formed with the unit direction vectors is a rhombus of unit length, whose diagonals are also its angle bisectors.

Thus, the angle bisectors are,

$$ m_k + m_l = \left(\dfrac{-1}{\sqrt 5} + \dfrac{3}{\sqrt{13}}\right)\vec i + \left(\dfrac{2}{\sqrt 5} - \dfrac{2}{\sqrt{13}}\right) \vec j $$

$$ m_k - m_l = \left(\dfrac{-1}{\sqrt 5} - \dfrac{3}{\sqrt{13}}\right)\vec i + \left(\dfrac{2}{\sqrt 5} + \dfrac{2}{\sqrt{13}}\right) \vec j $$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.