Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have come across the following exercise (the context is curves and surfaces in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and the Gauss map):

If $C=\alpha(I)$ is a line of curvature, and $k$ is its curvature at $p$, then $$ k = \mid k_n k_N \mid $$ where $k_n$ is the normal curvature at $p$ along the tagent line of $C$, and $k_N$ is the curvature of the spherical image $N(C) \subset S^2$ at $N(p)$.

I am not sure I understand the question, though... because it seems to me that if $C$ is a line of curvature, the normal curvature should be identical to the curvature of $C$ itself, hence $k = k_n$. Am I mistaken?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

$C$ being a line of curvature means that the tangent vector of $C$ at every point is a principal direction, not that its normal curvature is identical to its curvature.

To solve your problem, you will need a formula for curvature that doesn't use parameterization by arc-length since the gauss map doesn't always give a curve parameterized by arc length. Let's use

$k(t) = \frac{|\alpha' \times \alpha''|}{|\alpha'|^3}$ (exercise 12 in section 1-5 of Do Carmo, which you are probably using?)

$C$ being a line of curvature means that the Gauss map $N$ is such that

$N'(t) = \lambda(t) \alpha'(t)$ where $-\lambda(t)$ is the curvature in the direction of $\alpha'(t)$

If you compute the curvature $k_N$ using these two formulas you should get the result after rearranging. Comment if you have more questions :)

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, that helped me to solve the exercise! Though I am still having a hard time visualizing this curve... – koletenbert Jul 25 '11 at 23:03
I tried to find a way to "see" the result too but was unsuccessful so far... – Vhailor Jul 26 '11 at 3:06

Suspect that is when line of curvature not always being a geodesic. When surface normal and normal (from Frenet-Serret frame) do not coincide, it is due to a tangential $ k_g $ component in general.. $ k^2 = k_g^2 + k_n^2 $.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.