Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've just started reading a book on functional analysis, and first definition given there is for a metric and metric space:

Let $\mathfrak{M}$ be an arbitrary set. A function $\rho\colon \mathfrak M\times\mathfrak M\to[0,\infty)$ is called metric if it has the following properties:

1) $\rho(x,y)=0 \iff x=y$ (axiom of identity)

2) $\rho(y,x)=\rho(x,y)\;\forall x,y\in\mathfrak M$ (axiom of symmetry)

3) $\rho(x,y)\le\rho(x,z)+\rho(z,y)\;\forall x,y,z\in\mathfrak M$ (triangle inequality)

The pair $(\mathfrak M,\rho)$ is called metric space.

First and second identities don't make any surprise, I understand them. But what about image of $\rho$ and third inequality? They don't seem to hold in Minkowski space, where if we check interval as candidate for metric, we get $$s^2=t^2-x^2-y^2-z^2,$$ which can be negative and violate triangle inequality (and if take square root, it becomes complex and inequality makes no sense in this case).

So this clearly isn't a metric. But is Minkowski space then not a metric space? What is it then?

share|cite|improve this question
I've wondered this for so long. Favourited. – goblin Oct 14 '13 at 18:55
from wikipedia (search metric): "In differential geometry, one considers metric tensors, which can be thought of as "infinitesimal" metric functions. They are defined as inner products on the tangent space with an appropriate differentiability requirement. While these are not metric functions as defined in this article, they induce metric functions by integration." – Dubious Oct 14 '13 at 18:59
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Minkowski space is a metric space, but the metric is not the "Minkowski metric".

share|cite|improve this answer
OK, but what metric would make sense for Minkowski space? Which one is actually used, e.g. in special relativity? – Ruslan Oct 15 '13 at 6:32
The topology is the standard one of ${\mathbb R}^4$. Which metric (in the "metric space" sense) you use for that is not particularly relevant. – Robert Israel Oct 15 '13 at 6:52

It's a real vector space with an indefinite bilinear form.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.