Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a follow up to my previous question on Silver indiscernibles.

Background: Suppose that $0^\#$ exists, $\alpha<\lambda$ are limit ordinals, $i_\alpha$ is the $\alpha$th Silver indiscernible, and $\lambda$ is contained in $L_{i_\alpha}$ (which is just the model generated by the first $\alpha$ indiscernibles). In $V$, we can define an injection from $\lambda$ to $\omega\times\alpha^{< \omega}$ by simply specifying which term and indiscernibles generate each member of $\lambda$.

Question: Suppose that $\lambda$ is not a Silver indiscernible, is there also a constructible injection from $\lambda$ to $\omega\times\alpha^{< \omega}$?

Edit: By Francois' answer to my previous question, I can now see that the injection described in the background can't be in L (as the union of members in the range of the function will give an infinite constructible set of indiscernibles), so I just want to emphasize that any constructible injection to $\omega\times\alpha^{< \omega}$ (or just to $\alpha$) would be fine as an answer.

Edit #2: Due to the answer written by Apostolos, I've added the assumption that $\lambda$ is not a Silver indiscernible.

share|improve this question
    
Your LaTeX skills improve, but you have much to learn young grasshopper :-) –  Asaf Karagila Jul 18 '11 at 22:58

1 Answer 1

In $L$ every Silver indiscernible is a cardinal (since every real uncountable cardinal is a Silver indiscernible). If $\alpha$ is a limit ordinal and $i_\alpha>\alpha$ then since the indiscernibles are unbounded in $L_{i_\alpha}$ we have that there is some $\beta<\alpha$ such that $i_\beta>\alpha$.This $i_\beta$ is a cardinal in $L$ so there can be no constructible injection from $i_\beta$ to $\alpha$. Because $L$ satisfies the Axiom of Choice, we have that $|\omega\times\alpha^{<\omega}|=|\alpha|$ in $L$ and thus the injection you are looking for doesn't exist.

EDIT: It is not clear what exactly you are looking for with your edit. Obviously, for any ordinal larger than the $i_\beta$ that I used above, (for example $i_\beta\cup\{i_\beta\}$ which as a successor ordinal is not a Silver indiscernible) no such bijection exists. Of course there are many ordinals to which a bijection from $\alpha$ exists (namely $(|\alpha|^+)^L$ many), but (the point of my post is that) in the case when the $\alpha$th Silver indiscernible is not a fixed point of the ordinals, there are ordinals for which no bijection between them and $\alpha$ exists.

share|improve this answer
    
Perhaps I'm missing something, but in order to complete this argument, you need to show that $i_\beta$ < $\lambda$, and it's not clear that there is an indiscernible between $\alpha$ and $\lambda$. –  ZeroDagger Jul 19 '11 at 10:53
    
@ZeroDagger: I took as $\lambda$ the indiscernible $i_\beta$. –  Apostolos Jul 19 '11 at 11:31
    
Thanks. Unfortunately, it seems that I forgot to add the assumption that $\lambda$ is not a Silver indiscernible. I've now edited my question accordingly. –  ZeroDagger Jul 19 '11 at 11:41
1  
Apostolos has the right idea. Every Silver indiscernible is in fact inaccessible in $L$. There will be a constructible injection $\lambda \to \omega\times\alpha^{<\omega}$ if and only if $\lambda < \max((|\alpha|^+)^L,\omega_1^L)$. If $\alpha < i_\alpha$, then $i_\alpha$ is necessarily much larger than $\max((|\alpha|^+)^L,\omega_1^L)$. –  François G. Dorais Jul 19 '11 at 12:50

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.