Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $p$ be a prime number, and consider a Dirichlet character $\chi : (\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times \to \mathbf C^\times$. Its image lands in the group $\mu_{p-1}$ of $(p-1)$-st roots of unity.

The Gauss sum is defined as $\eta(\chi) := \sum_{a=1}^p \chi(a) \zeta_p^a$, where $\zeta_n = \exp(2\pi i/n)$. By the preceding remark, $\eta(\chi) \in \mathbf Q(\zeta_{p(p-1)})$. Now, since $p$ is relatively prime with $p-1$, $$\text{Gal} (\mathbf Q(\zeta_{p(p-1)})/\mathbf Q) \simeq \text{Gal}(\mathbf Q(\zeta_p)/\mathbf Q) \times \text{Gal}(\mathbf Q(\zeta_{p-1})/\mathbf Q),$$ (which identifies with $(\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times \times (\mathbf Z/(p-1)\mathbf Z))^\times$ in the usual way).

Thus, we can let $\text{Gal}(\mathbf Q(\zeta_p)/\mathbf Q) = (\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times$ act on the Gauss sum $\eta(\chi)$. An easy calculation shows that, for $a \in (\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times$, the corresponding automorphism $\sigma_a$ acts on the Gauss sum by

$$\eta(\chi)^{\sigma_a} = \overline{\chi}(a) \eta(\chi).$$

The map $\sigma_a \mapsto \eta(\chi)/\eta(\chi)^{\sigma_a}$ is (by definition) a $1$-coboundary of the $(\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times$-module $\mathbf Q(\zeta_{p(p-1)})^\times$, and the fact that $\eta(\chi)/\eta(\chi)^{\sigma_a} = \chi(a)$ shows that this coboundary actually lands in the trivial $(\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times$-module $\mu_{p-1}$. Therefore, the Gauss sum determines a cohomology class in

$$H^1((\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times, \mu_{p-1}) = \hom((\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times, \mu_{p-1}) = \widehat{(\mathbf Z/p\mathbf Z)^\times},$$

and the formula $\eta(\chi)/\eta(\chi)^{\sigma_a} = \chi(a)$ shows that this cohomology class is precisely the Dirichlet character we started with.

Now, I am puzzled. Have I gone full circle, or is there actually something going on? Why does the Gauss sum "realize" the Dirichlet character as a coboundary coming from the larger module $\mathbf Q(\zeta_{p(p-1)})/\mathbf Q)$? I'm not so sure what is the right way to think about this. Any insight appreciated!

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.