Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am currently going through "Log-gases and random matrices" by PJ Forrester. I'm coming from a totally different academic background, and I cannot understand a point of his notation. More precisely, he defines an antinunitary time reversal operator $T=\mathbf{Z}_{2N}K$ where $\mathbf{Z}_{2N}$ is the tensor product of the $N\times N$ identity matrix and of the $2\times2$ matrix $\begin{bmatrix}0 &-1\\ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$, and where $K$ is the complex conjugate operator. So if I understand correctly, $T$ acts on a matrix $\mathbf{A}$ like so \begin{equation} T\mathbf{A} =\mathbf{Z}_{2N}\bar{\mathbf{A}}, \end{equation} right? Where I stop following is how one should deal with $K$ in "mixed operations", i.e. since it is not presented as a martix, how does one invert $K$, apply it "from the right", etc.

The property i'm trying to understand is the following: commutation relations between Hermitian matrices $\mathbf{A}$ and $T$ lead to \begin{equation} \mathbf{A} = T \mathbf{A} T^{-1} = \mathbf{Z}_{2N}K\mathbf{A} K^{-1} \mathbf{Z}_{2N}^{-1} = \mathbf{Z}_{2N}K\mathbf{A} K \mathbf{Z}_{2N}^{-1} = \mathbf{Z}_{2N}\bar{\mathbf{A}}\mathbf{Z}_{2N}^{-1} \end{equation} From what I gather, $T$ is more or less treated as a matrix (at least with regard to inversion operation), and $K$ is it's own inverse (that, i understard). The puzzling point for me is the last equality. Does The second $K$ disappears because it is applied (with no effect) to the real matrix $\mathbf{Z}_{2N}^{-1}$? I cannot seem to find anything on the subject easily... I just need a confirmation of my understanding, and possibly further reading material!

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

For your first question, if $y=Kx$, then $y=\bar{x}$ and hence $x=\bar{y}=Ky$. Therefore the inverse operator of $K$ is $K$ itself and hence $T^{-1}=\left(\mathbf{Z}_{2N}K\right)^{-1}=K^{-1}\mathbf{Z}_{2N}^{-1}=K\mathbf{Z}_{2N}^{-1}$.

For your second question, the answer is no. What specific matrix $K$ applies to is irrelevant. For any vector $x$, we have $KAKx=KA\bar{x}=\overline{A\bar{x}}=\bar{A}x$. Therefore $KAK=\bar{A}$.

share|improve this answer
    
Oops! I Failed to see this little complex conjugate of a complex conjugate trick. Thank you very much! –  JGab Oct 4 '13 at 1:57
    
@JGab You are welcome. –  user1551 Oct 4 '13 at 1:59

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.