Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Assuming $f\neq 0$ I'm trying to rewrite $$0 = 2 \cdot g \cdot ((x-a)^2 + 1) - 2 \cdot d \cdot f \cdot (x - a)$$

into a system of equations of the form

$a = $(something not containing $d$)

$d = $(something with $a$ in it)

I'm pretty sure you need to introduce another variable but I'm just not seeing the "trick".

share|improve this question
    
You won't get a linear system, and I don't think you can decouple the variables, but here goes: divide by 2, put $df(x-a)$ on the left side, divide out the extra factor to get $d=\cdots$; write $y=x-a$ and solve the equation as a quadratic equation to get $y$ in terms of $g, f, d$, then write $a=x-y$. –  anon Jul 13 '11 at 18:37
    
Thank you for the comments, but I really would like the variables decoupled. Eventually I need to generalize for more terms and the quadratic trick won't work for this. –  Jon Jul 13 '11 at 18:57
    
Are you saying you want the upper equation not to contain $d$ and/or the lower equation not to contain $a$? That won't be possible. You only have one scalar equation, you can't turn it into two independent ones. Are you thinking of something like $xy=0\Rightarrow x=0\lor y=0$? There's an "or" in there, whereas between your two equations there's an implied "and". –  joriki Jul 13 '11 at 19:07
    
If that isn't possible, maybe relax the condition so $d = $(something with $a$ in it) but $a = $(something not containing $d$) –  Jon Jul 13 '11 at 19:15
2  
Since you can solve the quadratic for $a$ and get an expression for $a$ that depends on $d$, it's impossible to also get an expression for $a$ that doesn't depend on $d$. –  joriki Jul 13 '11 at 19:26
add comment

2 Answers

If you don't mind trig parametrizations, another quite simple looking solution is:

$a = x - \tan(\phi)$

$d = \dfrac{2 g}{f \sin(2 \phi)}$

Maybe $\phi$ was the extra variable you mentioned, although the expression for $d$ doesn't involve $a$ explicitly.

share|improve this answer
1  
Thanks for editing, J M - I tried "frac", but the result was too small. Must remember "dfrac" for future use ;-) –  John R Ramsden Aug 13 '11 at 10:52
add comment

This is probably not what you want, but here goes: $$\displaylines{a=Q+17\cr d={((x-a)^2+1)g\over(x-a)f}\cr}$$ Maybe if you tell us what's wrong with this answer, we can make some progress toward understanding your question.

EDIT: I wonder if what you really want is

new variable equals something containing $a$ but not $d$,

$d$ equals something containing new variable but not $a$

such as $Q=x-a$, $d=(Q^2+1)g/(Qf)$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.