Is there an example of a sigma algebra that is not a topology? If this is not the case, is it possible to prove that all sigma algebras are topologies?
|
|
If a $\sigma$-algebra contains all one-point sets then the topology it generates is the discrete topology, so the only thing we need to ensure is that we have a $\sigma$-algebra in which not every set is measurable. The very first example that comes to mind is already an example. As there are non-Borel sets in $[0,1]$ the Borel sets are not the discrete topology, but the smallest topology that contains the Borel sets is the discrete topology by the above paragraph.
Added: A similar argument works for the Lebesgue $\sigma$-algebra. In a positive direction: Every $\sigma$-algebra on a countable set is a topology. To sum up:
For the sake of completeness:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Let $S$ be any uncountable set, and let $\mathcal{A}$ be the collection of all subsets of $S$ which are either countable or have countable complement. This collection is evidently closed under complementation. If I have a countable union of elements of $\mathcal{A}$, all of which are countable, then the union is countable. Otherwise, at least one element is cocountable, hence so is the union. A similar argument works for intersections. So $\mathcal{A}$ is a $\sigma$-algebra. It is not a topology because it contains all the singleton sets but not all subsets of $S$ -- in particular, it contains no set which is uncountable with uncountable complement. |
|||||||||||||
|
