Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

An engineer wishes to estimate the mean yield of chemical process based on the yield measurements $X_1$, $X_2$, $X_3$ from three independent runs of an experiment with variance $\sigma^2$.

Consider the following two estimators of the mean yield $\theta$:

$$\dfrac{X_1+X_2+X_3}{3} \quad\text{and}\quad \dfrac{X_1+2X_2+X_3}{4}.$$

Which is a better estimator? Justify with the appropriate statistical procedures.

share|cite|improve this question

We prefer to use caps for random variables. Note that $$E\left(\frac{X_1+X_2+X_3}{3}\right)=\frac{1}{3}\left(E(X_1)+E(X_2)+E(X_3)\right)=\mu,$$ where $\mu$ is the common mean of the $X_i$.

Similarly, $$E\left(\frac{X_1+2X_2+X_3}{4}\right)=\frac{1}{4}\left(E(X_1)+2E(X_2)+E(X_3)\right)=\mu.$$

So our two estimators are both unbiased estimators of $\mu$.

Since the $X_i$ are independent, we have $$\text{Var}\left(\frac{X_1+X_2+X_3}{3}\right)=\frac{1}{9}\left(\text{Var}(X_1)+\text{Var}(X_2)+\text{Var}(X_3)\right)=\frac{\sigma^2}{3}.$$

Also, $$\text{Var}\left(\frac{X_1+2X_2+X_3}{4}\right)=\frac{1}{16}\left(\text{Var}(X_1)+2^2\text{Var}(X_2)+\text{Var}(X_3)\right)=\frac{6\sigma^2}{16}.$$

The variance of the second estimator is greater than the variance of the first. Thus the first estimator is "better" than the second.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.