Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why the following is true :

"Every transitive action of an abelian group is regular"

Does this mean that every action of an abelian group is free? because as i understand, a regular action is an action that is transitive and free. but i know this is not true because an abelian group acting trivially is not acting freely!!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

In response to comments of the questioner, I expand (it is correct that the statement need not be confined to action on a finite set. The use of the fact that the image group is Abelian to show regularity is more subtle).

There is an important word missing. Every faithful transitive action of an Abelian group is regular. If $\phi:G \to {\rm Sym}(\Omega)$ is a homomorphism and $G\phi$ is a transitive Abelian subgroup of ${\rm Sym}(\Omega)$, then $G\phi$ is regular, since for any $x \in G$, we see that $\langle x \phi \rangle \lhd G\phi$ as $G\phi$ is Abelian, so that $G\phi$ permutes the fixed points of $x\phi$. But since $G\phi$ is transitive, all points of $\Omega$ must be fixed by $x\phi$ and $x \in {\rm ker} \phi$. Hence we have shown that $x\phi$ fixes an element of $\Omega$ if and only if $x \in {\rm ker}\phi$. But since $G\phi$ is transitive by hypothesis, $G\phi$ is regular. We have used the fact that $G\phi$ is Abelian (actually just that all its subgroups are normal), though it is not necessary for the proof that $G$ itself be Abelian. However, to say that the action is faithful means that ${\rm ker} \phi =1$, so that $G\phi \cong G$, and so in tht case, if $G\phi$ is Abelian, $G$ must also be Abelian.

share|cite|improve this answer
you are supposing that the action is on a finite set $X$ of cardinality $n$ so that you identified $Aut(X)$ with $S_n$ why? and where did you use abelian here? – palio Jul 11 '11 at 19:55
I have addressed your comment by editing my original answer. – Geoff Robinson Jul 11 '11 at 20:16
I like to think of this as follows: a transitive action is equivalent to an action (via multiplication) on some subgroup (and its cosets). Saying that action is faithful is equivalent to saying that subgroup is core-free, and saying that action is regular is equivalent to saying that subgroup is the identity. – user641 Jul 11 '11 at 21:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.