Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

An algebraic variety is called a complete intersection if its defining ideal is generated by codimension many polynomials.

A Noetherian local ring $R$ is called a complete intersection if its completion is the factor ring of a regular local ring by a regular sequence.

What is the connection between these two definitions?

share|cite|improve this question
They are compatible when they both apply. For instance, if $P$ is a point on a variety $V$, then $V$ is a local complete intersection at $P$ -- i.e. there is some affine open neighborhood of $P$ which is isomorphic to a complete intersection in affine space -- iff the local ring at $P$ is a complete intersection ring. Or so I would think: I am leaving this as a comment rather than an answer to give someone with more expertise an opportunity to correct me. – Pete L. Clark Jul 9 '11 at 16:06
@Pete: Could you give me a proof of that, please? – Jacob Fox Jul 9 '11 at 16:13
Not off the top of my head, unfortunately. I would have to pull some books off my shelf (and, you know, it's Saturday). More seriously, there are other regulars on this site who would do a better job. I'll bet they'll show up soon enough: let's see. – Pete L. Clark Jul 9 '11 at 16:41
I did a quick search through EGA, and IV-19.3.2 the following is proved: A quotient of a regular local noetherian ring is a complete intersection if and only if the ideal is generated by a regular sequence. So this means that the question reduces to whether a variety is locally a complete intersection (in the classical sense) if and only if it is cut out by a regular sequence. One direction holds (if it's cut out by a regular sequence, then the dimension is what you want), but the other seems much less obvious to me. – Akhil Mathew Jul 9 '11 at 17:03

I heard it is open whether a local complete intersection (in your second sense), is actually a complete intersection. That is, if a local ring $R$ is such that $\hat R\cong T/(\underline x)$, $T$ regular, $\underline x$ regular on $T$, then must $R$ be isomorphic to $Q/(\underline y)$, $Q$ regular, $\underline y$ regular on $Q$?

But I found this on MO which is probably more relevant to your actual question.

share|cite|improve this answer
Well, not open anymore: – user26857 Nov 25 '14 at 12:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.