Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
Proof for formula for sum of sequence $1+2+3+\ldots+n$?

Is there a shortcut method to working out the sum of n consecutive positive integers?

Firstly, starting at $1 ... 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15.$

Secondly, starting at any other positive integer ...($10$ e.g.): $10 + 11 + 12 + 13 = 46$.

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by robjohn Nov 11 '12 at 12:46

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

The solution to the second problem follows from a solution of the first since $(m+1)+\cdots+n=S(n)-S(m)$ where $S(k)=1+\cdots+k$. About the first... the legend says that Gauss as a schoolboy realized quickly that if you sum as $(1+n)+(2+(n-1))+\ldots$ all the summands are the same, thus...... – Andrea Mori Jul 9 '11 at 9:45
Alternately, if there are $n$ successive integers, starting with $m+1$, the answer is $mn + (1 + 2 + \ldots + n)$. – Geoff Robinson Jul 9 '11 at 10:02
I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate. :) – Beni Bogosel Jul 9 '11 at 10:15
BTW: MarkUp is not allowed in subject title of posts. I've removed the asterisks. – Willie Wong Jul 9 '11 at 11:15
This is not at all a duplicate of the question its marked as a dupe of. This is asking for a simple formula, the other a detailed proof. Very different things. StackExchange has an epidemic of busy bodies marking things as duplicates unnecessarily and destructively. – B T Dec 18 '15 at 8:10
up vote 18 down vote accepted

Take the average of the first number and the last number, and multiply by the number of numbers.

share|cite|improve this answer
... and this works for any arithmetic progression – Henry Jul 9 '11 at 10:20

The rule, as given by Gerry's answer (and the generalization as per Henry's comment) can be easily visualized, in a similar way as we deduce the area of a rectangular trapezium:

enter image description here

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks Leon. Great illustration of the math. – Carl Jul 13 '11 at 11:44

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.