Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

To establish the relation between weak convergence and characteristic functions, the book I'm studying suggest without proof the following theorem:

For any tight sequence of probability measures, there exists a weakly convergent subsequence.

For the proof the author refers to "a rather difficult theorem", the Helly selection principle.

Can anyone suggest me a more simple and direct proof, at least for unidimensional case?

share|cite|improve this question
the skeleton of the proof appear obvious and common... associate a sequence of distribution functions to probability measures.. use the fact that distributions functions are bounded and the Bolzano-Weierstrass to construct a pseudo-distribution-function over rationals, extend this to reals, then show this function is a true distribution function using the thightness... but after that we need to show that distributions functions converges to the constructed distribution function in any continuity point... and this last part appear difficult – unlikely Jul 8 '11 at 12:47

I would refer you to to Billingsley's book Convergence of Probability Measures. This is an excellent introduction to the area of convergence in distribution.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.