Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm stuck with a detail in the proof of the characterization of epimorphism of sheaves on a site in the Mac Lane & Moerdijk book "Sheaves in Geometry and Logic".

I want to prove that: "If $\phi:F \to G$ is an epimorphism of sheaves in the Grothendieck topos $Sh(\mathscr{C},J)$ then for each $C\in \mathscr{C}$ and $\forall y \in G(C)$ there is a cover $S$ of $C$ such that $\forall f:D\to C$ in $S$ the element $y\cdot f$ is in the image of $\phi_D:F(D)\to G(D)$''. (Here $y \cdot f$ means $G(f)(y)$).

The book goes like this: define a presheaf $A \subset G$ by $A(C):=\{y \in G(C) : \exists S \in J(C) \ \forall f:B \to C\in S \ \ \ \ \ y\cdot f \in Im(\phi_B)\} $, $A$ is in fact a sheaf (thus a subsheaf of $G$). The author suggests to apply the lemma for which if $A$ is a subpresheaf of the sheaf $G$ then $A$ is a sheaf iff $\forall C \in \mathscr{C}, \ \forall x \in G(C), \forall S \in J(C)$ it holds that $x \in A(C)$ whenever $x\cdot f \in A(D) \ \forall f:D \to C \in S$.

The problem is that I don't know how to use it, or better how to show that in this precise case such an $x$ does really belong to $A(C)$. What I tried is to consider for each arrow $f\in S$ (same notation as in the lemma) a cover $R_f \in J(D)$ (the one of the definition of the presheaf $A$) such that $((x \cdot f) \cdot g) \in Im(\phi_E) \ \ \forall g:E \to D \in R_f$, this because by hypothesis $x \cdot f \in A(D)$. I took then a preimage $y_g \in F(E) \ \ \forall ((x \cdot f) \cdot g)$ , so that $\phi_E(y_g)=((x \cdot f) \cdot g)$, hoping that $\{y_g\}_{g \in R_f}$ was a matching family. For, in that case, an amalgamation of that family would be sent by $\phi_D$ to $x \cdot f$, obtaining that $x \in A(C)$. I did not succeed in proving this (and maybe it's not even true), so please will you help me?

Thanks in advance :)

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You're given $x \in G(C)$ and a cover $S$ of $C$ such that for all $f \colon D \to C$ in $S$, $x \cdot f$ is in $A(D)$. By definition of $A$, the latter means that there is a cover $R_f$ of $D$ such that for all $g \colon E \to D$ in $R_f$, $x \cdot f \cdot g$ is in $Im(\phi_E)$.

By the transitivity axiom for Grothendieck topologies, the sieve $T$ on $C$ consisting of all $f \circ g$ with $f \in S$ and $g \in R_f$ covers $C$ (because its restriction along any $f \in S$ is $R_f$, hence covering). Now, by construction, for all $f \circ g \colon E \to C$ in $T$, $x \cdot (f \circ g) = x \cdot f \cdot g$ is in $Im(\phi_E)$. Thus, $x \in A(C)$.

By the lemma, this shows that $A$ is a subsheaf of $G$.

share|improve this answer
Perfect, just what I was looking for... Thank you very much! –  Edoardo Lanari Sep 25 '13 at 13:48

Let $\phi : F \to G$ be an epimorphism of sheaves on a space (or topos). Consider the image sheaf $\mathrm{im}(\phi)$. A section in this sheaf is a section in $G$ which locally has a preimage in $A$. Then $\mathrm{im}(\phi) \to G$ is a monomorphism and an epimorphism, hence an isomorphism.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer! But I would like to understand the proof of the book, just to know where's the problem.. thanks anyway! –  Edoardo Lanari Sep 24 '13 at 21:22

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.