Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am reading the book Introduction to lie algebras and representation theory. I have some difficulty in understanding some parts of the book for Freudenthal's formula.

  1. Page 120, line 6, why $m(\mu-i\alpha)=n_0+\cdots+n_i$? Here $m=\langle\mu,\alpha\rangle$ is an integer and $\mu,\alpha$ are weights. So $m(\mu-i\alpha)$ is an element in $H^{*}$ where $H$ is the Cartan subalgebra. But $n_0+\cdots+n_i$ is an integer. How to prove this formula? What does figure 1 on this page mean?

  2. Page 121, section 22.3, line 7, why $(\mu,\mu)=\sum_{i,j}a_ia_j\kappa(h_j,h_i)$? Here $\mu(h_i)=\sum_{j}a_j\kappa(h_j,h_i)$.

  3. Page 123, example 22.4, I cannot compute some of the data in table 1. For example, $(\mu+\delta, \mu+\delta)$. When $\mu=\lambda=\lambda_1+3\lambda_2$, $\delta=(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)/2$, $(\mu+\delta, \mu+\delta)=(13\alpha_1/6+17\alpha_2/6, 13\alpha_1/6+17\alpha_2/6)$. But $(\alpha_1,\alpha_1)=(\alpha_2,\alpha_2)=2$, $(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)=\sqrt{2}\times \sqrt{2}\cos (2\pi/3) = -1$. I cannot get $(\mu+\delta, \mu+\delta)=28/3$.

Thank you very much.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

[Edit: Massive editing coming up. I now have my copy of Humphreys with me]

1) Here $m(\mu)$ denotes the multiplicity of a weight $\mu$ in the representation under discussion. It is perhaps a bit unfortunate that here $m$ is both a constant $m=\langle\mu,\alpha\rangle$ and a mapping $m=m_V:\Lambda\rightarrow\mathbf{Z}$. You have to look at the context to figure out which it is at each point.

2) This goes back to §8. You are adviced to review it. I had to, too! It is easy to forget the origin of the inner product (the Killing form), after you have absorbed the geometric viewpoint, where we identify the weights as a lattice in a Euclidean space. Here $(\mu,\mu)= \kappa(t_\mu,t_\mu)$, so by plugging in the expansion $t_\mu=\sum_ia_ih_i$ we get $$ (\mu,\mu)=\sum_{i,j}a_ia_j\kappa(h_j,h_i)= \sum_i a_i\left(\sum_ja_j\kappa(h_j,h_i)\right)=\sum_ia_i\mu(h_i)=\sum_i\mu(h_i)\mu(k_i).$$ [/Edit]

3) Surely $\delta=\lambda_1+\lambda_2=(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)$. Also $\cos2\pi/3=-1/2$. But why don't you use the basis of the fundamental weights? $||\lambda_1||^2=||\lambda_2||^2=1/3$ and the angle between them is $\pi/3$, so $||a\lambda_1+b\lambda_2||^2=(a^2+ab+b^2)/3.$ Here $\mu+\delta=2\lambda_1+4\lambda_2$, so the squared norm is $(2^2+2\cdot4+4^2)/3=28/3$.

share|cite|improve this answer
thank you very much. But by definition (page 122, the equation below (12)), $\delta=(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)/2=(\lambda_1+\lambda_2)/2$. – LJR Jul 8 '11 at 0:36
No. In all these character formulas $\delta$ equals the sum of the fundamental weights, and also half the sum of all positive roots. This example is about $A_2$, so the positive roots are $\alpha_1,\alpha_2$ and $\alpha_1+\alpha_2$. Their sum is $2\alpha_1+2\alpha_2$, and half of that is $\alpha_1+\alpha_2$. – Jyrki Lahtonen Jul 8 '11 at 4:55
What Humphreys denotes $\delta$ is often also denoted $\rho$. But whatever the notation, it is an element of the weight lattice, IOW is an integer linear combination of the fundamental weights. Either there is a typo in that formula, or you misread "simple root" in place of "positive root". IIRC Jantzen uses $\rho$. That is also used in e.g. . – Jyrki Lahtonen Jul 8 '11 at 7:10
BTW. I don't mean to sound negative. It is good for you to work your way thru these examples. I recall needing to backpedal several times in this chapter. I produced several sheets of papers with the weight lattices of $A_2$, $B_2$ and $G_2$ drawn on them. It really helps when working on things like Weyl's character formula. Courage and patience! – Jyrki Lahtonen Jul 8 '11 at 7:15
thank you very much. – LJR Jul 8 '11 at 13:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.