Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

can someone please let me know if the following is correct:

1) Let $\mathbb{Z}$ be the integers endowed with the discrete topology and $\mathbb{N}$ the natural numbers. Is $\mathbb{Z}^{\mathbb{N}}$ a discrete space with the product topoogy?

2) Does $\mathbb{Z}^{\mathbb{N}}$ contain a compact infinite set?

3) Is $\mathbb{Z}^{\mathbb{N}}$ metrizable?

My work:

1) I think this is false, let $A= \{0\} \times \{0\} \times ...$ Suppose $A$ is open in $\mathbb{Z}^{\mathbb{N}}$ then we can find a basic open set $U=\prod_{n \in \mathbb{N}} U_{n}$ such that $(0,0,0,...) \in U \subset A$. By definition of product topology there exists a natural number $J$ such that if $n>J$ then $U_{n} = \mathbb{Z}$. This in turn implies that:

$U_{1} \times U_{2} ...\times U_{J} \times \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z} ... \subset \{0\} \times \{0\} \times ...$

which is not true since we can pick $z \in \mathbb{Z} \setminus \{0\}$ then $(0,0,...0,z,z,z...)$ is the LHS while not in the RHS.

2) Can we simply say, take $\{0,1\}$ endowed with the discrete topolgy then $\{0,1\}$ is compact since it is finite. But then by Tychonoff theorem $\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{N}}$ is compact and clearly infinite.

3) I think this one is true right? $\mathbb{Z}$ is metrizable (e.g discrete metric) and the countable product of metrizable spaces is metrizable.

share|cite|improve this question
1) no, it is homeomorphic to the set of irrational numbers. 2) yes, it contains $\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{N}}$, as you say 3) yes, a countable product of metrizable spaces is metrizable. – t.b. Jul 6 '11 at 15:19
@Theo Buehler: without using the homeomorphism you mention, how would you prove it is not discrete? – user10 Jul 6 '11 at 15:21
Your argument is fine. Note that $(0,\cdots,0,1,0,\cdots)$ ($1$ at entry $n$) converges to zero as $n \to \infty$ by what you say. Alternatively, prove 3) by writing down an explicit metric and check that this sequence converges to zero. – t.b. Jul 6 '11 at 15:24
@user10: just exhibit a nontrivial convergent sequence. – Qiaochu Yuan Jul 6 '11 at 15:24
up vote 13 down vote accepted

The space $\mathbb{Z}^{\mathbb{N}}$, which is of course homeomorphic to $\mathbb{N}^{\mathbb{N}}$, is often called the Baire space — not to be confused with spaces satisfying the Baire category theorem, which are also called Baire spaces. Using continued fractions one can show that $\mathbb{N}^{\mathbb{N}}$ is homeomorphic to the subspace of $\mathbb{R}$ consisting of the irrational numbers. If you believe this last fact, all your questions become rather obviuous. Here are some comments on your approach:

  1. Your argument in 1) shows that the sequence $x_{n} = (0,\ldots,0,1,0,\ldots)$ (the $1$ appears at the $n$th entry) converges to $0$. Therefore $\mathbb{Z}^{\mathbb{N}}$ is not discrete, and as it is a topological group, it contains no isolated points at all.

  2. Yes, you can embed the space $C = \{0,1\}^{\mathbb{N}}$ into $\mathbb{\mathbb{Z}}^{\mathbb{N}}$. As a product of compact spaces, $C$ is compact (alternatively, show that $C$ is homeomorphic to the usual Cantor ternary set). The obvious map $C \to \mathbb{Z^N}$ (coming from the inclusion ${0,1} \to \mathbb{Z}$) is continuous and injective, hence a homeomorphism onto its image, as $C$ is compact and $\mathbb{Z^N}$ is Hausdorff. Clearly $C$ is uncountable.

  3. It is not hard to check that a countable product $X = \prod X_i$ of metric spaces is metrizable, for instance $\sum 2^{-i} \frac{d_i}{1+d_i}$ furnishes a compatible metric. If each $X_n$ is separable/completely metrizable then so is $X$.

As a last remark, the Baire space is a separable, completely metrizable space (such spaces are usually called Polish spaces). In fact, it is universal in the the following sense: every other Polish space is a quotient space of $\mathbb{N}^{\mathbb{N}}$. This, together with the fact that one can encode a basis of open sets handily using paths in the tree $\omega^{\lt\omega}$ makes the space $\mathbb{N}^{\mathbb{N}}$ an extremely important tool in descriptive set theory. A very nice book on all I'm claiming here and very much more is Kechris's Classical descriptive set theory, which I heartily recommend.

share|cite|improve this answer
There is also Moschovakis' book about descriptive set theory, which is highly recommended by many people as well. – Asaf Karagila Jul 6 '11 at 15:49
@Asaf: Yes, true. Moschovakis is a very fine book, too; but I never really worked with it, so I can't recommend it with clear conscience. I find Kechris very interesting because of all its interesting applications to other parts of mathematics. – t.b. Jul 6 '11 at 15:51
Just bringing it up, I have the both open (I have an exam on the subject in a few days) and my teacher praised Moschovakis' book often (although he worked with both, and on some portion he came up with his own proofs and ideas). – Asaf Karagila Jul 6 '11 at 15:59
@Asaf: Well, actually I think Moschovakis is a person, not a book, but you got my meaning in my previous comment :) Good luck at your exam! (I'm glad that I have all my exams way behind me). As a person working a lot with functional analysis, Kechris is especially appealing because it contains many things that are extremely hard to locate elsewhere (in a language I can understand without much effort, that is). – t.b. Jul 6 '11 at 16:04
@Theo Buehler: thanks a lot! – user10 Jul 6 '11 at 16:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.