Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is what I found in: H.B. Lawson, Lectures on Minimal Submanifolds, Vol.1, Publish or Perish, pp.34-36.

On a complex projective space Kähler form looks like this \begin{align} \omega_{0}=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}\sum_{i,j}g_{ij}dz^{i}\wedge d\overline{z}^{j}. \end{align} On the other hand \begin{align} \omega_{0} = 4\partial\overline{\partial}log |z|^{2}. \end{align} $z=(z^{0},..,z^{n})$. When I calculate the second equation I can not get the same expression as in the first equation. The problem is $\sqrt{-1}$, I can not get it. What would be the problem here? Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
There should be an $i$ in the defintion of the Kähler potential. See for example – mrf Sep 19 '13 at 7:04
Or perhaps Lawson uses $dd^c$ instead of $\partial \bar\partial$. – mrf Sep 19 '13 at 7:07
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The reason why we have $\sqrt{-1}$ is $K\ddot{a}hler$ form is a real valued (1,1) form. E.g. for complex 1-dim, locally, $\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}dz\wedge d\bar z=dx\wedge dy$. Also, $\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar\partial=kdd^c$, where k is a constant depending on how you define $d^c$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.