Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $a$ is proportional to $b$ does it imply that $b$ is proportional to $a$? This is a simple question which I have found others giving different answers.

share|cite|improve this question

migrated from Sep 18 '13 at 17:32

This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.

$a$ is proportional to $b$ means $a=kb\Leftrightarrow b=\frac1k a $.

So, the answer is yes.

share|cite|improve this answer

I've found different people mean different things when they use the word proportional. I always take it to mean the following: $$a\propto b \Leftrightarrow a=Cb, \ \ \ \ \text{(proportional)}$$ where $C$ is something that doesn't depend on $a$ or $b$. By the double arrow I mean the logic flows both ways. Now, you can invert this equation to get $$b=\frac{1}{C}a.$$ This last equation meets the same requirements as $b$ being proportianal to $a$.

In words, proportional to me means if you change one thing by some percentage or fraction, the other thing changes by the same percentage or fraction; for example, doubling one implies doubling the other.

Note that linear relationships do not have to be proportional: $$a=Cb+D \ \ \ \ \text{($a$ and $b$ linear, not proportional)}$$ Some people do use the word proportional when they really mean linear. However, even if $a$ is linear with respect to $b$, then $b$ is indeed linear with respect to $a$ as you can show using an exercise similar to the one above.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.