Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $k\subset K$ be number fields and $\mathfrak o_k\subset \mathfrak o_K$ their respective algebraic integers. Also let $\mathfrak P\neq 0$ be a prime (and hence maximal ideal) of $\mathfrak o_K$ lying above $\mathfrak p$. Can we reason that $\mathfrak o_K/\mathfrak P$ is Galois over $\mathfrak o_k/\mathfrak p$, if $K$ is Galois over $k$? [$\mathfrak o_k/\mathfrak p$ is associated with $\{\alpha + \mathfrak P\mid \alpha\in \mathfrak o_k\}\subset \mathfrak o_K/\mathfrak P$.]

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Sure, because every finite degree extension of finite fields is Galois.

There is a more general setup where the conclusion is not so trivial. Namely, suppose $R$ is an integrally closed domain with fraction field $K$, $L$ is a finite Galois extension of $K$ and $S$ is the integral closure of $R$ in $L$. Then for $\mathfrak{p}$ a nonzero prime ideal of $R$ and a prime ideal $\mathcal{P}$ of $S$ lying over $\mathfrak{p}$, one can ask whether the finite degree field extension $(S/\mathcal{P}) / (R/\mathfrak{p})$ is Galois. It turns out that it is always normal, so if $R/\mathfrak{p}$ is perfect then it is necessarily also separable and thus Galois.

See for instance Theorem 6 of these notes.

share|cite|improve this answer
okay, thanks. I feel awkward for even asking. Both results you mentioned are well known to me. – Peter Patzt Jul 5 '11 at 18:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.