Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Show that the series for which the sum of first n terms

$f_n(x)=\frac{nx}{1+n^2x^2}, 0\leq x\leq 1$ can not be differentiated term by term at $x=0$. What happens at $x\neq0$.

I have found similar questions but solved using Fourier Series. I am in need of a proof using Taylor series or Laurent Series and the basics of Cauchy's complex analysis and Sequence theorems.

share|cite|improve this question
What do you mean a "proof using Taylor series or Laurent Series"? Have you tried differentiating it term-by-term and seeing if you get a contradiction? – user61527 Sep 15 '13 at 6:19
I will make clear what I meant to ask. We know that a Taylor series can be differentiated term by term in its disk of convergence. Therefore I was looking for a proof which could show that the given series doesn't converge. – prat Sep 15 '13 at 6:51

This seems to have very little to do with Taylor or Laurent series, but here goes:

I assume that you mean $$ \sum_{k=1}^n u_k(x) = \frac{nx}{1+n^2x^2}$$ for some implicitly defined $u_k$. (I first read the questions as if the terms of the series where given by $f_n$, but that yields a divergent series.) Then by letting $n\to \infty$, we see that $$ \sum_{k=1}^\infty u_k(x) = 0$$ for $x \in [0,1]$. If we differentiate termwise we get $$ \sum_{k=1}^n u'_k(x) = \frac{n(1-n^2x^2)}{(1+n^2x^2)^2}$$ and at $x=0$, $$ \sum_{k=1}^n u'_k(x) = n$$ which certainly doesn't tend to $0$ as $n\to\infty$. I'll leave the case $x\neq 0$ to you. (Argue using the above computations.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.