# Is $SL(n,K) \cap D(n,K)$ always a maximal torus in $SL(n,K)$?

Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $SL(n,K), GL(n,K)$ denote the special linear group and general group respectively, and $D(n,K)$ is the diagonal subgroup of $GL(n,K)$.

Then $SL(n,K) \cap D(n,K)$ must be a torus, i.e. a connected diagonalizable subgroup, of $SL(n,K)$. But, must it be maximal?

When char$K=0$, this seems to be the case. When $K=\mathbb{Z}/(2)$ and $n=2$, $SL(2,K) \cap D(2,K)=\{e\}$, here, $e$ denotes the identity element of the two groups. And $e$ is the only diagonalizable matrix in $SL(2,K)$, so this is verified.

But how to prove that this is true in general? And if is not true, what is its counterexample?

Many thanks~

-

Let $T$ be a torus in $SL(n,K)$. Then $T$, considered as a subset of $M(n\times n,K)$, is a commuting set of diagonalizable matrices and as such is simultaneously diagonalizable, i.e. there is a $g\in GL(n,K)$ with $gTg^{-1}\subseteq SL(n,K)\cap D(n,K)$. Hence the dimension of any torus is bounded by the dimension of the intersection in question which shows that this intersection is indeed a maximal torus.
Sure, either again for dimension reasons, or if $T$ is a maximal torus and $T'$ is a torus containing $gTg^{-1}$, then $T$ is contained in $g^{-1}T'g$, hence they are equal and hence so are $gTg^{-1}$ and $T'$. –  Philipp Hartwig Jul 6 '11 at 8:57
@PhilippHartwig Can we generalize this? Namely, if $T$ is a maximal torus in $G$ and $H$ is a closed subgroup of $G$ such that the intersection $T\cap H$ is connected, does it follow that $T\cap H$ is a maximal torus in $H$? If not, what is missing? –  M Turgeon May 2 '12 at 19:15
@MTurgeon You need a closed normal(!) subgroup $H$ of $G$, then the proof carries over. If $H$ is not necessarily normal in $G$, the statement you are asking for fails: $H$ could be a maximal torus in $G$ different from $T$. –  Philipp Hartwig May 3 '12 at 6:10