Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question is somewhat of a continuation of this question that I had asked earlier -

Representations of a non-compact group are labeled by its maximal compact subgroup?

  • I want to know when or is it always true that an unitary representation of a non-compact Lie group is infinite dimensional? If yes then why? If no then kindly give examples.

  • Also when can one be sure that an infinite dimensional representation of some non-compact Lie group is labeled by a single representation of its maximal compact subgroup ?

share|improve this question
3  
I'm not sure exactly what you're asking in the second bullet point, but concerning the first I can tell you that it's obviously not true: How about the two-dimensional representation of $\mathbb{R}$ given by $t \mapsto \begin{bmatrix} \cos{t} &-\sin{t} \\\ \sin{t} & \cos{t}\end{bmatrix}$ or any character representation? –  t.b. Jul 4 '11 at 5:57
    
Maybe the question is whether evry inf. dimensional representation of a noncompact Lie-group is induced from a maximal compact subgroup? –  Mark Jul 4 '11 at 8:35
add comment

1 Answer 1

Unitary repns of non-compact non-abelian Lie groups tend to be infinite-dimensional. There is a divergence between two extreme types: nilpotent versus reductive (or semi-simple). Nilpotent (or solvable) Lie groups don't have very interesting compact subgroups. Reductive or semi-simple ones, like SL(2,R), do have.

For reductive/semi-simple Lie groups such as SL(2,R), most of the irreducible unitary repns are infinite-dimensional. The exceptions are trivial, like... the trivial repn. This is because a finite dimensional unitary repn would amount to a continuous group hom of the non-compact group into a (compact) orthogonal group, which is difficult (apart from the case of R mentioned above).

Some irred unitaries of special interest are indexed by what irreds of the maximal compact K occur in them. This is the case with the holomorphic discrete series repns of SL(2,R), which are indexed by the "lowest" repn of the circle group SO(2) appearing. Mostly, however, knowing the repn as a repn of K is completely insufficient to understand the isomorphism class of the repn of the group itself. This is clear already for the ("even") principal series repns of $G=SL(2,R)$, each of which includes all the repns $\pmatrix{\cos t & \sin t\cr -\sin t & \cos t}\rightarrow e^{2int}$, with $n\in Z$, with multiplicity $1$, and the others (with odd index in the exponent) with multiplicity $0$.

Varadarajan's little Cambridge book "intro to harmonic analysis on semi-simple Lie groups" is a relatively friendly intro to such things. Finite-dimensional repns theory, and repn theory of finite groups, does not give good hints about the sort of things that happen with non-compact, non-abelian, especially reductive, Lie groups!

The nilpotent case includes things like the Heisenberg group(s), whose repn theory is well understood, is quite different from the reductive case, and perhaps much simpler.

As in a comment: inducing from a maximal compact produces repns that are too large to be irreducible, in the Lie group case. However, in a different direction, it is true that for p-adic reductive groups like $SL_2(Q_p)$, some (but only relatively unusual) irreducible unitaries are essentially obtained by inducing from the maximal compact $SL_2(Z_p)$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.