Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In a previous, and quite popular, question it was discussed about whether or not $\pi$ contains all finite number combinations.

Let us assume for a moment that $\pi$ does in fact contain all finite combinations of numbers. What prevents $\pi$ from also containing all infinite sets?

It seems that at some point one would also see the first couple digits of, for example, $e$ (2.71828). But why does it need to stop there, couldn't it contain a bunch of digits of $e$? Perhaps even an infinite number of digits of $e$?

My understanding is that $e$ could also be replaced by $\sqrt2$ or any other irrational number, so long as that irrational number contained all finite sets of number combinations. Which might imply that somewhere along the way, $e$ contains a number of digits of $\pi$. Implying this ridiculous situation where within $\pi$ we see $e$, and then within $e$ we again begin to see $\pi$ again. Then all the universe collapses into a singularity. Or maybe someone can just explain why one infinite sequence can't contain another infinite sequence, and perhaps why we have not defined some type of super-infinity that can.

To reiterate the primary question: What prevents $\pi$, or other infinite irrational number that contains all finite sets of numbers, from also containing all infinite sets?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

If the decimal expansion of $\pi$ contained the string of digits '$000\ldots$' then it only has a finite number of non-zero digits (some subset of the digits before the string of $0$s starts) and so $\pi$ is a rational number. Contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer
That makes a lot of sense. So clear, I almost feel silly for not having realized it. – mwjohnson Sep 11 '13 at 1:35
The point is that infinite strings don't have an end (on the right as we write them) so there are very few infinite strings actually contained in $\pi$ - only those of the form $[10^n\cdot\pi]$ for $n\geq -1$ where $[\bullet]$ is the 'fractional part' function. – Dan Rust Sep 11 '13 at 1:38
Rationality and irrationality aside, if it contains 000000... it certainly cannot also contain 111111.... – Nate Eldredge Sep 11 '13 at 2:10
@NateEldredge Yeah there's a bunch of natural contradictions you can reach. – Dan Rust Sep 11 '13 at 2:15

There are an uncountable number of infinite digit strings, and $\pi$ contains only countably many infinite digit strings-namely all the ones that are the digits after some point in the expansion. It does contain infinite strings, just not most of them.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is a stronger answer because it also disposes of a lot of variations such as "what if we only want each infinite sequence of digits to appear at some set of positions that form an arithmetic progression?" – Henning Makholm Sep 11 '13 at 13:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.