Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm struggling to understand the difference of the analyticity of a real and a complex functions. Consider the following real valued function which is a minimal example of a somewhat more involved problem. I'm only interested in the behavior on the real axis in the interval $[0,\infty)$ and for $b>1$

$$f(x)=\exp\left( -x^b\right)$$

Since the composition of two analytic functions is again holomorphic, I guess we could reduce this further, leave out the exponential and concentrate on the power function. For this, a related problem was already given in this question although there, the goal was to investigate in the complex plane.

Question: What can be said about the analyticity of $f$ especially at $x=0$ when the real valued $b>1$?


Some observations and side questions

I chose $b>1$ to ensure that the derivative exists at $x=0$. If we derive we get

$$\partial_x \,f(x)=-bx^{b-1}\cdot \exp\left(-x^b\right)$$

and choosing $b\leq1$ would lead in the limit $x\to0$ to either $0^0$ or infinity. This doesn't seem to solve anything because even when $b>1$ I cannot calculated the limit $x\to-0$ because the expression is complex (and not real valued) for $x<0$. This leads to some side questions which I really like to have an answer for:

  1. Can one say the first derivative of $f$ exist at $r=0$, although I cannot take the limit from the right side?

  2. If I only need the function for $x\in[0,\infty)$, what are the practical considerations I have to take care of? Obviously, the second derivative is not ensured to exists. Something more?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

If $b$ is integral, then everything is fine; $f$ is an entire function, and the usual power series for the exponential will converge everywhere.

If $b$ is not integral, then there is a branch cut at $x = 0$, and the function is not analytic there. It is analytic on the open ray $(0,\infty)$, as you can easily check, but a power series centred at $r \in (0,\infty)$ will only have a radius of convergence equal to $r$.


Edit:

The 'side questions' are really where we start to see the difference between functions defined on the real line, and functions defined on the complex plane. Suppose $b$ is non-integral, and $b>1$. Then the first derivative can be defined on $[0,\infty)$, by the condition $f(x+\epsilon) - \epsilon f'(0) = \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)$ for $\epsilon \to 0^+$ (or $f'(0) := \lim_{x\to 0^+} f'(x)$). We could define a function $g$ on $(-\infty,0]$, for which $g(0) = f(0)$ and $g'(0^-) = f'(0^+)$. 'Gluing' $f$ and $g$ at zero gives a function which is continuously differentiable on $(-\infty,\infty)$. But, because $f$ has a branch cut at $x=0$, there is no way to extend this to a function which is complex differentiable at $0$.

Indeed, the special thing about holomorphic functions is the following: if $f(z)$ is continuously differentiable in some neighbourhood of $z_0$, then $f(z)$ is analytic at $z_0$.

I know the above is not a direct answer to side questions 1 and 2, but I think it gets to the relevant points.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer. Could you elaborate on the two side questions? That would be really helpful. Especially the the first one is interesting for me. –  halirutan Sep 10 '13 at 13:41
    
Thank you very much for sharing your insight. –  halirutan Sep 10 '13 at 16:22

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.