Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider $\mathbb{R}^n$ with the usual Euclidean topology, or the (equivalent) product topology. Let $U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ be open. Suppose that $V \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ is such that $V \cap \partial V \neq \emptyset$. Can there possibly exist a homeomorphism $h : U \to V$?

I have been thinking about this problem for a little while. My intuition is telling me that, no, such a homeomorphism cannot exist. After all, since $V \cap \partial V \neq \emptyset$, $V$ contains a few of its "edge" or boundary points. But, since U is open, it contains nothing of the sort. Certainly this property of being an "edge" or boundary point should be preserved (in some way) through homeomorphism?

Is there a basic topological argument that puts this question to rest, or a more advanced theorem that needs to be applied? I'm hoping we don't have bring forth the Jordan Curve Theorem here.

Hints or solutions are greatly appreciated.

share|improve this question
2  
The answer is "No, there can't be a homeomorphism". It's the invariance of domain, if a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is homeomorphic to an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$, it is itself open. I know no elementary or non-advanced proof, however. –  Daniel Fischer Sep 8 '13 at 17:20
    
In this exact case, the answer is "no", because you forgot the case when $U$ is connected and $V$ is not. If you add the hypothesis that both $U$ and $V$ are connected, take for (counter-)example the unit ball and the punctured unit ball. –  Marra Sep 8 '13 at 17:21
1  
@Daniel: Isn't this a complete answer? Why do you post this as a comment? –  Martin Brandenburg Sep 8 '13 at 17:22
    
@MartinBrandenburg I was hoping that somebody with a better recollection of algebraic topology could give a sketch of a proof. –  Daniel Fischer Sep 8 '13 at 17:26
    
@DanielFischer: Thanks for the comment! I don't have a great understanding of algebraic topology, but at least I know where the proof comes from now. I should eventually have a look in Munkres about homotopy theory :) –  jtms88 Sep 8 '13 at 17:45

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The theorem on the invariance of domain says that if $U \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is open, and $f \colon U \to \mathbb{R}^n$ is a continuous injective function, then $f$ is open, in particular $V = f(U)$ is an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$, and $f$ is a homeomorphism from $U$ to $V$.

So if $V \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is homeomorphic to an open $U \subset \mathbb{R}^n$, then $V$ itself must be open - the homeomorphism provides a continuous injective function $U \to \mathbb{R}^n$.

I know of no proof of the theorem of invariance of domain that does not use advanced techniques, unfortunately.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.