Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it true in general that every open set in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is a union of countably many disjoint balls (allowing infinite radius)?

My thoughts so far:

This doesn't seem true in general. For example, if we take $\mathbb{R}^2 - \{0\}$, which is open, we exclude the possibility of having $B(\{0, 0\}, +\infty)$ cover our set. Thus, any ball in our covering of $\mathbb{R}^2 - \{0\}$ must have finite radius. However, it remains to show that any covering by disjoint balls, each with finite radius, is uncountable.

share|cite|improve this question
So, you mean closed balls? I think $B(x,r)$ usually denotes an open ball. – Stefan Hamcke Sep 8 '13 at 17:12
Sorry, I mean open balls. – user93779 Sep 8 '13 at 17:13
I am used to $B(x,r)$ or $B_r(x)$ denoting an open ball. On the other hand, one can guess that you mean closed balls since open balls would not work due to connectedness. – Stefan Hamcke Sep 8 '13 at 17:16
So, you are sure you mean open balls? – Stefan Hamcke Sep 8 '13 at 17:17
No, but I agree with your reasoning if we assume that we're working with open balls. – user93779 Sep 8 '13 at 17:19

No, even with uncountably many disjoint open balls it won't be possible. The reason is that if $\mathcal B$ is such a cover for the open set $U$, then take a ball $B\in\cal B$. This $B$ is open, but so is its complement as the union $\bigcup(\mathcal B\setminus\{B\})$ of all balls distinct from $B$. This implies that $U$ is disconnected, unless it can be covered by a single open ball.

Edit: Sorry, I realized that there can't even exist uncountably many disjoint balls. For if $\mathcal A$ is a family of disjoint sets, each with a non-empty interior, then we could choose an element $q_A$ in $\Bbb Q\times \Bbb Q\ \cap\ \text{int} A$ for each $A\in\cal A$. This gives an injection from $\mathcal A$ to $\Bbb Q\times\Bbb Q$, hence $\cal A$ can at most be countable.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.