Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $m$ be a positive integer of the form $m = 2s$, where $s$ is an odd integer. Prove that there do not exist positive integers $x$ and $y$ such that $x^2 - y^2 = m.$

Proclaimed Solution via Proof by Contradiction: Assume, to the contrary, that there exist positive integers $x$ and $y$ such that $(x - y)(x + y)= m = 2s \quad \text{ where $s$ is an odd integer.} \tag{*}$ We consider two cases, according to whether $x$ and $y$ are of the same parity or of opposite parity. $\boxed{\text{Case 1:}}$ If $x$ and $y$ are of the same parity, then both $x - y$ and $x + y$ are even.
$\boxed{\text{Case 2:}}$ If $x$ and $y$ are of opposite parity, then both $x - y$ and $x + y$ are odd. Produce a contradiction in each case.

$\Large{1.}$ The product of two even numbers is always even. Thus, $(x - y)(x + y)$ is even. Then $(*)$ becomes: $\text{even = 2(odd)}$. Where is the contradiction?

The analogous solution works for Case 2? The product of two odds is always odd. Then $(*)$ becomes: $\text{odd = ($2s$ = even)}$. Contradiction.

$\Large{2.}$ What is the motivation behind considering "whether $x$ and $y$ are of the same parity or of opposite parity"?

Source: Exercise 5.22, P124 of Mathematical Proofs, 2nd ed. by Chartrand et al

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted
  1. Suppose that $x+y$ and $x-y$ are both even; then there are integers $k$ and $\ell$ such that $x+y=2k$ and $x-y=2\ell$. But then $2s= (x+y)(x-y)=4k\ell=2(2k\ell)$, so $m=2k\ell$, and $s$ is therefore even, contradicting the hypothesis that $s$ is odd.

  2. The two cases need to be considered separately, because each requires a different argument. Are you also asking how you might realize that if confronted with the problem? That’s largely a matter experience and partly a matter of recognizing that when the hypotheses specifically involve parity ($m$ is odd), parity may play a rôle in the proof.

share|cite|improve this answer
$m$ is meant to be even - I believe you mean that $2s = 4 kl \implies s = 2kl$, contradicting that $s$ is odd. – user61527 Sep 6 '13 at 5:58
@T.Bongers: Yep; I mentally interchanged $m$ and $s$. Thanks. – Brian M. Scott Sep 6 '13 at 6:01
@BrianM.Scott: Many thanks. Yes, I was asking how I would foreknow/prevision the master step here of "whether $x$ and $y$ are of the same parity or of opposite parity"? Is T. Bongers's explanation (For which I upvoted) analogous to yours? Or are there other ways? – Timere Sep 6 '13 at 8:53
@LePressentiment: T. Bonger’s explanation goes a little deeper than mine. Mine was intended to explain why you might think about parity in the first place; his actually deals more with how you might see the contradiction that arises if $x+y$ and $x-y$ have opposite parity. I can’t offhand think of another really likely way to approach the problem. – Brian M. Scott Sep 6 '13 at 8:57
@BrianM.Scott: Thank you again for your help. I would've liked to choose both answers. I have voted for yours for now because I didn't see anything in the question that involved divisiblity of 4 and so I wouldn't have reckoned divisibility by 4 which underlies T. Bonger's answer. – Timere Sep 6 '13 at 9:07

Regarding case 1: If $x - y$ and $x + y$ are both even, then $(x - y)(x + y)$ is divisible by $4$, and so $s$ cannot be odd.

As far as motivation, the technique is somewhat suggested by considering that the right hand side is divisible by $2$ exactly once - so the left side must be divisible by $2$ exactly once, so $x - y$ and $x + y$ must have opposite parity.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much. I value your answer to my Q2 the most. Sadly, only one best answer is allowed, so I've upvoted at the moment. I hope that you will not mind my choice. Would you be able to explicate how and why one would divine/suspect that it is the divisibility by 4 which begets the contradiction? Only because I still don't apprehend this do I feel Prof Scott's solution is more natural. If this could please be unriddled and Prof Scott does not mind, I'll be happy to change the Accepted Answer. – Timere Sep 6 '13 at 9:21

For the first case, the contradiction lies in the fact that both $\left(x-y\right)$ and $\left(x+y\right)$ are even. This means that \begin{eqnarray*} \left(x-y\right)\left(x+y\right) & = & \left(2x\right)\left(2y\right)\\ & = & 4xy. \end{eqnarray*} If a number is $2s=2\left(2k+1\right)=4k+2$, then it is not a multiple of four. That's the contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer
You've used $x$ and $y$ twice to mean two different things in your first set of equations. – user61527 Sep 6 '13 at 5:57

1) The contradiction is that $(x-y)(x+y)$ is divisible by $4$, but $2$(odd) is not.

2) The motivation is that it exhausts all possibilities. If x and y are not of the same parity, we have the contradiction that $(x+y)(x-y)$ is odd, but $2s$ isn't.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.