Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Henry Briggs compiled the first table of base-$10$ logarithms in 1617, with the help of John Napier. My question is: how did he calculate these logarithms? How were logarithms calculated back then?

I've found these pages to be fairly useful, but they don't seem to say much in the way of what I'm looking for. Any answers or useful references would be appreciated.

share|improve this question
6  
Well, you just hammer down a few logs and a plate, and you get a table. :-) –  Asaf Karagila Sep 5 '13 at 17:14
4  
@AsafKaragila Naturally ... –  Hagen von Eitzen Sep 5 '13 at 17:20
6  
@HagenvonEitzen if he did it naturally, it would be a natural-log table :P –  Omnomnomnom Sep 5 '13 at 17:29
1  
@exk an interesting proposition, given that Brook Taylor introduced Taylor series 100 years later. To be sure though, the Mercator series was first published in 1668, and isn't a terribly efficient means of calculation except for values sufficiently near $1$. –  Omnomnomnom Sep 5 '13 at 18:22
2  
Richard Feynman gives an account of Briggs's work in Chapter 22, "Algebra" of "The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 1". –  awkward Sep 5 '13 at 23:14

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

At MAA you may find 'Logarithms: The early history of a familiar function' while Napier's logarithms are described with care in Roegel's article 'Napier's ideal construction of the logarithms' (rather less nice than the usual ones since using $10^7$ as reference!). A shorter description was given by Lexa in 'Remembering John Napier and His Logarithms' and should provide a good starting point.

Napier's work itself appears in 'A Description of the Admirable Table of Logarithms' : Edward Wright's $1616$ translation of Napier's Latin book.
A book from $1915$ named 'Napier tercentenary memorial volume' is proposed by archive.org.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for a very thorough answer. I'll be sure to look at those. –  Omnomnomnom Sep 6 '13 at 15:50
    
Glad you liked it @Omnomnomnom ! Cheers, –  Raymond Manzoni Sep 6 '13 at 20:54

This video from numberphile could be worth a watch

share|improve this answer
    
That's precisely what prompted the question :) –  Omnomnomnom Sep 6 '13 at 23:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.