Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In an arbitrary category, we have that even if $X$ and $Y$ have a product $X \times Y$, the natural projections needn't be epimorphisms.

Two questions:

  1. Are there (preferably simple!) conditions we can place on the category such that all the natural projections are, in fact, epimorphisms?

  2. Without assuming anything about the category, is there a (preferably interesting!) weaker property that the natural projections always possess?

share|cite|improve this question
To answer 1 : Note sure about any condition more general than requiring that the category contain a zero object. Not sure about 2 either. – Prahlad Vaidyanathan Sep 1 '13 at 16:11
(1) is not true for $\mathbf{Set}$, so I would say there are no reasonable conditions. – Zhen Lin Sep 1 '13 at 16:37
@ZhenLin, ah of course. Take $X=0$ and $Y$ non-empty, then $X \times Y \rightarrow Y$ isn't epic. I always forget the $X=0$ case.... – goblin Sep 1 '13 at 16:43
@ZhenLin does $\mathrm{Set}^{\mathrm{Op}}$ have the property of interest? I think so but I may be getting confused about the zero case. – goblin Sep 1 '13 at 16:44
Yes, it is true for $\mathbf{Set}^\mathrm{op}$, or more generally, the opposite of any elementary topos. – Zhen Lin Sep 1 '13 at 17:05
up vote 2 down vote accepted

You might like this theorem:

If $\pi _i:P {\to} A_i$ for $i\in I$ is a product and if $i_0 \in I$ is such that, for each $i \in I$, $hom(A_{i0} ,A_i)$ is not empty then $\pi _{i0}$ is a retraction.

In general the $\pi _i$ form an extremal mono-source


Abstract and concrete categories: the joy of cats. Propositions 10.21 and 10.28

share|cite|improve this answer
I do like that theorem! Is there a special name for objects $Y$ such that for all objects $X$ we can find a morphism $f : X \rightarrow Y$? The projections associated with any product of such objects are necessarily retractions, by the theorem you give. – goblin Sep 1 '13 at 17:41
I would call $Y$ weakly terminal. But note that this assumption is too strong, we really only need that the factors map to each other. – Martin Brandenburg Sep 1 '13 at 20:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.