Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking for a hint or feedback on what I've already done, not a full solution. $f=t\sin{\left(\frac{1}{t}\right)}$ for $t\ne 0$, $f(0)=0$,
My idea is that I only have to worry about the steep parts.

My approach:
Proof sketch: Let $\epsilon > 0 $ be arbitrary, we seek to find $\delta$ such that $\forall x,y \in [0,1]$, $|x-y|<\delta \Longrightarrow |x\sin{\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}- y\sin{\left(\frac{1}{y}\right)}|<\epsilon$

\begin{align*} & t\sin{\left(\frac{1}{t}\right)} = \frac{2}{\pi(4k+1)} \text{ is true for } t =\frac{2}{\pi(4k+1)} \\ & t\sin{\left(\frac{1}{t}\right)} = - \frac{2}{\pi(4k+3)} \text{ is true for } t =\frac{2}{\pi(4k+3)} \end{align*} and \begin{align*} &\text{distance}\left(f_1\left(\frac{2}{\pi(4k+1)}\right), f_1\left(\frac{2}{\pi(4k+3)}\right)\right) = \\ & \frac{2}{\pi(4k+1)} - \left(- \frac{2}{\pi(4k+3)} \right) =\\ & \frac{16k+8}{\pi (4k+1)(4k+3)}=\\ & \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)\frac{4k+2}{(4k+1)(4k+3)} & \end{align*} Define $\epsilon(k) = $ such $k$ so that $$ \left(\frac{4}{\pi}\right)\frac{4k+2}{(4k+1)(4k+3)} < \epsilon $$

So as long as $\delta = \frac{2}{\pi(4\epsilon(k)+1)} - \frac{2}{\pi(4\epsilon(k)+3)}= \frac{4}{\pi(4\epsilon(k)+1)(4\epsilon(k)+3)}$ we should be good? I am trying to focus on the pre image of the steepest parts of the function and then looking at the width of that. I am pretty brain dead right now... I feel like this delta works, but I need more/better justification...

share|cite|improve this question
Rustyn, hi! You only need to worry about what happens at $0$; I assume you are defining $f(0)=0$, right? And you know that sine is bounded. – Andrés Caicedo Aug 28 '13 at 6:18
@AndresCaicedo Yes, that's right f(0) = 0, and I played around with the idea that sine is bounded, that gives that every delta works for epsilon greater than or equal to 2. – Rustyn Aug 28 '13 at 6:20
@AndresCaicedo I think I will assume that I can use the theorems from analysis I. I will have to prove them first, grrrrr – Rustyn Aug 28 '13 at 6:31
@StefanSmith thanks, but I've already finished the problem – Rustyn Aug 29 '13 at 16:41

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

For the part $2$ of @copper.hat's, you might use this point that if $0<|x|<\delta$ and get $\epsilon=\delta$ then $$\left|x\sin(1/x)\right|=|x||\sin(1/x)|\leq|x|<\epsilon$$

share|cite|improve this answer
$+1 \ddot \smile$ – amWhy Aug 29 '13 at 0:02

I'm not sure what you are trying to do above.

Try splitting the proof into two parts:

Part 1: take $t \in (0,1]$. This is straightforward as $t \mapsto t$, $t \mapsto \frac{1}{t}$, and $\sin$ are continuous, and so their compositions and products are too.

Part 2: Determine continuity at $t=0$. Presumably you have $f(0) = 0$, so you need to show that for any $\epsilon>0$, you can find a $\delta>0$ such that if $t \in [0,\delta)$ then $|f(0)-f(t)| < \epsilon$. This should be straightforward too.

share|cite|improve this answer
It seems Rustyn is trying to argue that the function is uniformly continuous. But this follows automatically from mere continuity, by compactness. – Andrés Caicedo Aug 28 '13 at 6:21
I could already have done part 1 and part 2, if I had proved those facts that you are using in part 1 – Rustyn Aug 28 '13 at 6:24
@copper.hat grrrrrr Your answer doesn't work if the student is taking analysis I and analysis II at the same time. LOL!!!! – Rustyn Aug 28 '13 at 6:27
Proving Part 1 from first principles seems pretty messy? – copper.hat Aug 28 '13 at 6:39
@RustynYazdanpour: But his points are enough for an student who gets Calculus I to find out the problem. – Babak S. Aug 28 '13 at 6:39

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.