Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have an infinite sum of analytic functions that is guaranteed to converge for every $x$, except for $x=0$: \begin{equation} g(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty f_n (x) \end{equation} I want to expand the function $g(x)$ in a Laurent series around $x=0$.
For example if $f_n(x)=e^{-nx^2}$, then: \begin{equation} g(x)=\frac{1}{e^{x^2}-1} \approx \frac{1}{x^2}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{x^2}{12} ... \end{equation} The problem is that in general I don't have a closed-form expression for $g(x)$.
However, I think I should still be able to obtain a closed-form expression for the coefficients of the Laurent series. Taylor-expanding $f_n(x)$ is not good enough, since the terms of the Taylor series do not necessarily converge in $n$ (in the above example they don't).

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

When dealing with analytic functions, you really need to consider complex $x$, not just real $x$. In your example the series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty e^{-n x^2}$ converges only when $\text{Re } x^2 > 0$. In any example where the series converges [EDIT: uniformly on compact subsets ] in a punctured disk $\{z: 0 < |z| < \epsilon\}$ you can indeed take the Laurent series term-by-term. If convergence is only in some sectors, I doubt that much can be said in general, especially if you want closed-form solutions.

share|improve this answer
    
You're absolutely right, thank you. But what if I need the series expansion of $g(x)$ only where the sum converges in the first place? Even better: what if I only need the first term of the series? Isn't there a way to derive that from the functions $f_n (x)$? –  Joe Jun 27 '11 at 8:28
1  
You can expand g(x) around a point in the region where the sum converges. So in your example, if you take it around $x=1$, $f_n(x) = e^{-n} - 2 n e^{-n} (x-1) + n (2n - 1) e^{-n}(x-1)^2 + \ldots$, and then you can sum each term over $n$ to get the expansion of $g(x)$ in powers of $x-1$. –  Robert Israel Jun 27 '11 at 13:43
    
Then I guess that if I want to expand $g(x)$ around a point the sum doesn't converge in, even if I want the expansion to hold only in a region where the sum does converge, I'm out of luck. Oh well, thanks anyway! –  Joe Jun 28 '11 at 6:38
    
I have another thought: the problem is in expanding $g(x)$ around a point which is on the boundary of the region in which the sum converges. However, in the example I gave the closed-form expression for $g(x)$ is defined also in regions where the sum doesn't converge (it only has poles at $x^2=2\pi n$ for integer $n$). Thus we can have a series expansion around $x=0$ because it is just an isolated pole. So what I'm asking now is: is there way to learn something from the functions $f_n(x)$ about the analytical continuation of $g(x)$ to regions where the sum doesn't converge? –  Joe Jul 1 '11 at 10:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.