Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that every irreducible representations of $S_n$ can be found in $\mathbb{C}S_n$. I wonder how can I prove that irreducible representations of a finite groups $G$ can be found in $\mathbb{C}G$. I thought to use the embedding of $G$ in $S_n$, but then I don't know how to go on. Could any of you help me, please?


Maybe I got it: I know that the character of the regular representation can be viewed as the sum of the characters of the irreducible representations with coefficients their dimension, so they are in the decomposition of the regular representation. Am I right?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 11 down vote accepted

To prove this statement using characters is kind of working backwards.

You can prove this statement without characters as follows: first, show that any simple $A=\mathbb{C}[G]$-module $M$ is a quotient of $A$. To do that, fix $0\neq m\in M$ and define $\mathbb{C}[G]\rightarrow M, \; \sum\alpha_gg \mapsto\sum\alpha_gg(m)$. Show that this is onto ($M$ is simple) and use the isomorphism theorem. Now, use Maschke's theorem to show that if $M$ is a quotient of $A$, then it is also a direct summand of $A$.

For details of all this, see e.g. Proposition 2.14 of my notes on representation theory.

share|improve this answer

$\mathbb{C}[G]$ is the free $\mathbb{C}[G]$-module on one generator. That means it satisfies $\text{Hom}_{G}(\mathbb{C}[G], M) \cong M$ for any $\mathbb{C}[G]$-module $M$ (since a $G$-morphism is uniquely determined by the image of $1$, which is arbitrary); in particular, this is nonzero for any simple $M$, so there exists a nonzero $G$-morphism whose image must be all of $M$ by simplicity. Then one appeals to Maschke's theorem.

In fact this argument tells you more: it immediately implies that the multiplicity of $M$ in $\mathbb{C}[G]$ is $\dim_{\mathbb{C}} M$ without character theory. Until the step involving Maschke's theorem, this argument is valid for an arbitrary ring $R$: any simple left $R$-module is a quotient of $R$ (as a left $R$-module). This implies that in fact it must be isomorphic to $R/m$ where $m$ is a maximal left ideal.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.