Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would like to have a second opinion and assistance on the following:

Let there be a linear transformation going from $\mathbb{R}^3$ to $\mathbb{R}^2$, defined by $T(x,y,z)=(x+y,2z-x)$. Find the transformation matrix if base 1: $\langle (1,0,-1) , (0,1,1) ,(1,0,0)\rangle$ , base 2 : $\langle (0,1),(1,1)\rangle$ . An attempt at a solution included calculating the transformation on each of the bases in $\mathbb{R}^3$, (base 1) and then these vectors, in their column form, combined, serve as the transformation matrix, given the fact they indeed span all of $B_1$ in $B_2$.

Another point: if the basis for $\mathbb{R}^3$ and $\mathbb{R}^2$ are the standard basis for these spaces, the attempt at a solution is a correct answer.

share|cite|improve this question
But you have to take the result vectors and express them with regard to the 2nd basis. – Gerry Myerson Aug 23 '13 at 12:59
and why is that? isn't it enough I had already put them through the transformation which puts them in R^2? consider this: the bases for R^3 and R^2 are the standard bases for these that case the attempt at a solution works and gives the correct come? – Bak1139 Aug 23 '13 at 13:04
Because the definition of the transformation matrix is the matrix $A$ such that $Av=T(v)$ when $v$ is expressed in the basis of the domain and $Tv$ is expressed in the basis of the codomain. – Gerry Myerson Aug 23 '13 at 13:11
but they already are in that basis, aren't they? that of the image domain that is... – Bak1139 Aug 23 '13 at 13:24
Look: $T(1,0,-1)=(1,-3)$. But $(1,-3)=(-4)(0,1)+(1)(1,1)$, so what is $(1,-3)$ with regard to the standard basis is $(-4,1)$ with regard to the given basis, and if you want $Av=T(v)$ then you have to use that $(-4,1)$, not $(1,-3)$. – Gerry Myerson Aug 23 '13 at 13:31

Let us call the basis of $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ $\lambda_{1},\lambda_{2},\lambda_{3}$ and the basis of $\mathbb{R}^{2}$ $\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2}$

So all u need to do now is just do the foolwing:

$T(\lambda_{1}) = \alpha_{11}\gamma_{1} +\alpha_{21}\gamma_{1} $

$T(\lambda_{2}) = \alpha_{12}\gamma_{1} +\alpha_{22}\gamma_{1} $

$T(\lambda_{3}) = \alpha_{13}\gamma_{1} +\alpha_{23}\gamma_{1} $

while $\forall \alpha_{i,j} \in \mathbb{R}$

And the matrix will look like:

$[T]=(\begin{matrix} \alpha_{11} & \alpha_{12} & \alpha_{13} \\ \alpha_{21} & \alpha_{22} & \alpha_{23} \\ \end{matrix})$

And this is how it is done

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.