Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

(This is from a proof by contradiction, so that's why the equality does not actually hold. Edited for brevity; I don't think I've omitted anything pertinent to my questions.)

[...] The monotonicity of $f$ implies that $2^u<3^v$ if and only if $3^u<6^v$, $u$, $v$ being positive integers. Taking logarithms this means that $\frac{v}{u}>\log_2 3$ if and only if $\frac{v}{u}>\log_3 6$. Since rationals are dense, it follows that $\log_2 3 = \log_3 6$. This can be written as $\log_2 3 = \frac{1}{\log_2 3}+1$, and so $\log_2 3$ is the positive solution of the quadratic equation $x^2−x −1=0$ [...]

  • Question 1

When he concludes that:

Since rationals are dense, it follows that $\log_2 3 = \log_3 6$.

What is the reason for this? Wouldn't this only be true if $\frac{v}{u}$ goes to $0$?

  • Question 2

[$\log_2 3 = \log_3 6$] can be written as $\log_2 3 = \frac{1}{\log_2 3}+1$.

This one is the most confusing. How did he jump from $x=y$ to $x = \frac{1}{x}+1$?

share|improve this question
    
@Austin: That's why the question starts out by explaining that this is from a proof by contradiction. –  joriki Jun 24 '11 at 0:28
1  
On Question 1: No, $v/u$ doesn't have to go to $0$ -- it follows that $\log_2 3$ and $\log_3 6$ are equal because if they were not, we could find a rational between them, which would contradict one of the two inequalities. –  joriki Jun 24 '11 at 0:31
    
@joriki why would it contradict the inequalities? — wouldn't, say, $\frac{v}{u}>\log_2 3>\log_3 6$, or vice versa, hold without contradicting either inequalities? –  fakaff Jun 24 '11 at 3:16
    
That's not between them. –  joriki Jun 24 '11 at 4:13
    
But isn't that still consistent with the two inequalities? That's what I don't understand: How does either inequality require that there not be a rational between them? — For example, if I say $x>2$, $x>1$, then $x>2>1$ is perfectly OK; one would not then assume that $1=2$. Then why is it not OK for $\frac{v}{u}>\log_2 3>\log_3 6$? — How did you arrive at the conclusion that there cannot be a rational between them? –  fakaff Jun 24 '11 at 4:34

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Here is help for Question 2:
First note that by the change of base formula, we have that $$\log_{3}6=\frac{\log_{2}6}{\log_{2}3}.$$

Also, $$\log_{2}6=\log_{2}3+\log_{2}2.$$

Combining the above results should resolve all the issues.

share|improve this answer
    
Got it, thanks. –  fakaff Jun 24 '11 at 0:49
    
you are welcome...:) –  Nana Jun 24 '11 at 1:07

Nana's answer is fine. Alternatively, $${1\over\log_23}+1=\log_32+1=\log_32+\log_33=\log_36$$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.