Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X_1, \cdots, X_n$ be $n$ random variables (not necessarily independent) such that $E[X_i] > E[X_j]$ whenever $i < j$. I am interested in obtaining lower bounds on the following probability: $P[ (X_1 > X_2) \wedge (X_1 > X_3) \wedge \cdots \wedge (X_1 > X_n) ]$.

share|cite|improve this question
Identically distributed? – Emre Jun 23 '11 at 19:12
@Emre, no they are not identically distributed – Travis Service Jun 23 '11 at 19:13
Note that "lowerbounding" is not a word. There is a single word for this -- minorizing -- but it is now somewhat obscure and old-fashioned. Good mathematical prose does not call attention to itself, so I have suggested an unobtrusive alternative. – Pete L. Clark Jun 24 '11 at 1:19

The lower bound is $0$.

For example let $X_i = -(i^{k-1})$ with probability $\frac{i^2-1}{i^k-1}$ for some $k>2$, and $X_i=-\frac{1}{i}$. Then $E[X_i]=-i$, satisfying the condition.

If $i <j$ then both possible values of $X_i$ are between the two possible values of $X_j$. In particular, $X_1 = -1$ with probability 1. Meanwhile $\frac{i^2-1}{i^k-1}$ is a decreasing function of $k$, so as $k$ increases the more negative value of $X_i$ becomes less likely.

So $\Pr(X_1 > X_2)$ and the longer expression can be made arbitrarily small by increasing $k$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.