Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be the subspace of $\mathbb{R}^2$ consisting of the graph of the absolute value function. That is, $X=\{(x,|x|) : x\in\mathbb{R})\}$.

We define a functional structure on $X$ by restricting smooth real valued functions defined on open subsets of the plane: an open set $U\subset X$ has the form $U=V\cap X$, where $V\subset\mathbb{R}^{2}$ is open. Then define $f\in F(U)$ iff $f=g|_{U}$, where $g$ is a smooth real value function on $V$.

E.g., The function $\pi_{2}(x,y)=y$ is smooth on any neighborhood $V$ of the origin. Therefore, its restriction to $U=V\cap X$ is in $F(U)$ (note that the restriction is not smooth at the origin).

Question: Is $\mathbf{X}$ with the functional structure $\mathbf{F}$ a differentiable manifold? (Defining smooth manifolds via functional structures: here).

It seems to me that it is not a differentiable manifold. I tried showing that at the origin it is not locally isomorphic to $(\mathbb{R},C^{\infty})$ (the real line with the functional structure of smooth real valued functions). Assuming that there is a local isomorphism at the origin I was trying to get to a contradiction more or less using functions such as $\pi_{2}$ above, which are not smooth when restricted to $X$. Nothing has worked so far...

Note: Clearly $X$ is not a manifold in $\mathbb{R}^{2}$. This is discussed for example in this and this posts.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The smooth structure on $\mathbb R$ has the following property: if $f\in C^\infty(\mathbb R)$ and $f\equiv 0$ on some half-line (a connected component of $\mathbb R\setminus \{a\}$), then there is $h\in C^\infty(\mathbb R)$ such that $h(a)=0$ and $$\lim_{x\to a}\frac{f(x)}{h(x)}=0 \tag1$$ The above basically says that $f'(a)=0$, but is stated solely in terms of the functional structure. Consequently, the property is preserved by isomorphisms.

However, $(X,F)$ does not have the above property. Indeed, the smooth function $g(x,y)=x+y$ restricts to a function $f$ on $X$ that vanishes on a connected component of $X\setminus \{(0,0)\}$. There is no smooth function $h$ on $X$ for which (1) holds, because such a function would have to be non-Lipschitz at $(0,0)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I think I follow, but just in case, could you clarify what you mean when saying "Lipschitz at $(0,0)$". – John Aug 27 '13 at 20:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.