Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it possible to have a number that extends to the left of the decimal point in mirror image of an irrational number? Such as <...95141.30000...>, to write pi as a mirror image.

share|cite|improve this question
Isn't this a rather infinite "number"? It's larger than $1$, $10$, $100$, $1000$, etc. – t.b. Jun 23 '11 at 0:45
I don't know how to think of this kind of expression. Does it make any sense to write a number with an infinite expansion of digits on the left of the decimal? I first thought of this in trying to get the reciprocal to an irrational (which can be approximated by getting the reciprocal of a nearby rational number). But specify the irrational expansion as a ratio of (say) 3.14159.../1.000000..., and then flip numerator-denominator. What ARE those values, as counting numbers, in the num/denom places? – user12404 Jun 23 '11 at 0:51
10-adic numbers... – yoyo Jun 23 '11 at 0:53
10-adic numbers, OK, but Emphasis not real numbers – GEdgar Jun 23 '11 at 1:05
In case the OP (or any other reader) is interested and not aware of the construction, 10-adic numbers (as mentioned above by yoyo and GEdgar) are explained in the Introduction section of this Wikipedia entry. – Willie Wong Jun 25 '11 at 15:28

No. Why? Let us assume that we don't claim that the result is a 'number,' as it's infinite (problematic). We could make this more precise, saying that we want some sort of way of placing a 'mirror' in the middle of $\pi$ s.t. we have something like $ ... \alpha _3 \alpha _2 \alpha _ 1 | \beta _1 \beta _2 \beta _3 ... $ and such that $\alpha _i = \beta _i$.

But even this is not very meaningful, and you included the key problem in your question. Eventually, you will have an infinite string of zeroes on one side - but not possible on the other side (as the expansion of pi does not terminate).

I wrote that knowing that it's hardly sensible to describe, not because I enjoy fancying things that are awkward (which may or may not be true), but because there is an interesting related fact. For any finite number $k$, there exists a place to put the 'mirror' in the expansion of $\pi$ such that $\alpha _i = \beta _i \quad \forall \; i \in [0, k]$. And that's pretty cool, and even related to the question.

share|cite|improve this answer
Your last paragraph may be correct, but I am pretty sure that nobody has managed to prove it yet. It's related to the normality of $\pi$, which is an open question. – TonyK Jul 25 '11 at 19:04
@TonyK: you know, I was happy to write that at the time because I had read that statement in a paper just a few days beforehand. But I don't remember where - and you're certainly right that it's related to the normality of pi. But it's not as strong as saying pi is normal (at least, not at first sight). – mixedmath Jul 25 '11 at 19:10
Yes, there are certainly non-normal numbers that contain palindromes of arbitrary length. But has $\pi$ really been proven to contain palindromes of arbitrary length? I would love to see a reference! Is it perhaps related to the Bailey-Borwein-Plouffe formula (…)? – TonyK Jul 26 '11 at 16:44

protected by Qiaochu Yuan Sep 23 '11 at 16:36

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.