Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Among the smooth 1-manifolds (with or without boundary) which embed into $\mathbb{R}^2$, which ones can be represented by a single parametrization $z = (x,y) = f(t)$, for $t \in I$, where $I$ is an interval (not necessarily open or closed), and $f$ is smooth (i.e. infinitely differentiable)?

The reason I ask is that in my reading, I've come across two definitions for "line integral" (which I'm sure turn out to be equivalent):

The first is the standard definition given in most multivariable calculus and complex analysis classes, which relies on defining a "curve" as a (sufficiently nice) function (or image set) $z = \gamma(t)$. That is: $\int_\gamma f(z) dz = \int_a^b f(g(t))g'(t) dt$.

The second is the more high-powered definition involving 1-manifolds and differential 1-forms.

So my question is not really about whether or not these two definitions are equivalent per se, but rather about how much generality is lost by looking at only the "special" 1-manifolds which admit representations as $z = \gamma(t)$.

(My own thoughts: (1) Do these 1-manifolds end up being the 1-manifolds with an atlas consisting of one chart? I'm thinking not, because the circle cannot be given an atlas with one chart, yet can still be parametrized by a single function. (2) Does the Implicit Function Theorem have any role to play?)

share|improve this question
5  
Every compact connected 1-manifold is diffeomorphic to either $S^1$ or $[0,1]$. So your "special" 1-manifolds are precisely connected 1-manifolds. –  Ryan Budney Sep 15 '10 at 6:59
    
So every connected 1-manifold (not necessarily compact) in $\mathbb{R}^2$ can be given the form $(x,y) = f(t)$ for some smooth function $f$? Am I understanding you correctly? –  Jesse Madnick Sep 15 '10 at 7:48
2  
The OP didn't say "compact" so there's also $(0,1)$ and $[0,1)$. Anyway, if I am understanding your terminology correctly: yes, this means that every embedded $1$-manifold in the plane is parameterized by a smooth function. –  Pete L. Clark Sep 15 '10 at 11:12
1  
So, every connected 1-manifold (with or without boundary) (not necessarily compact) is diffeomorphic to one of: $(0,1)$, $[0,1)$, $[0,1]$, and $\mathbb{S}^1$, is that right? OK, so then you just take that diffeomorphism as the parametrization, I see. Thank you! –  Jesse Madnick Sep 15 '10 at 18:24
1  
@Ryan Budney Should one or more of these comments become an "answer" ? –  isomorphismes May 7 '11 at 21:31
show 2 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I believe this question has been answered:

several users commented on the fact that "every connected 1-manifold (with or without boundary) (not necessarily compact) is diffeomorphic to one of: $(0,1)$, $[0,1)$, $[0,1]$, and $\mathbb{S}^1$", and Ryan Budney noted that "The proof that 1-manifolds are all of this form isn't particularly hard, either. The idea is to orient a component then take the unit speed vector field on that component and use it to parametrize the component by arc length. You have to argue that such a parametrization is onto. Once you have that, the domain of the parametrization has to be a 1-dimensional submanifold of $\mathbb R$ which puts the problem into the land of single-variable calculus/analysis."

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.