Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I found this question in one of the exams given for a topology course and I couldn't get anything out of it; it just seemed overwhelming as a question, but maybe I'm missing something.

Let us define the cone on any topological space $Y$ as $c(Y) = Y \times [0,1]$ where $Y \times \{0\}$ is shrunk to one point. Prove that for any compact, connected surface without boundary with Euler characteristic less than $1$ its cone is not homeomorphic to $c(S^2)$.

The only thing I could do with it was to get it down to this (which is the same thing only with the characteristic requirement made explicit): $\forall n > 1$ $c(U_n)$ is not homeomorphic to $c(S^2)$ and $\forall n \geq 1$ $c(V_n)$ is not homeomorphic to $c(S^2)$. Where $U_n$ and $V_n$ are respectively standard non-orientable and orientable surfaces.

Actually, something I just came up with is that they can't be homeomorphic because $S^2$ is not homeomorphic to any of those surfaces, thus every fiber of those cones isn't homeomorphic to any fiber of the cone on $S^2$; but I don't think that's enough, am I right?

EDIT: the bounty is both for an answer which is different from mine, since I think there might be a "easier" approach to the question, and for an answer that might explain what (if there is) is wrong with my own approach.

share|improve this question
    
I took the liberty of adding the algebraic topology tag as the cone construction has its uses mostly there. Also: wouldn't "cones on surfaces" be a much more descriptive title? –  t.b. Jun 20 '11 at 22:51
    
I agree and I'll change it. I gave that title because the definition given in the problem was general :) –  Andy Jun 20 '11 at 22:55
5  
Did you study homology or the fundamental group in your course? Notice that $C(Y)$ as a space has at least point such that if you remove it, the resulting space is homeomorphic to $Y \times (0,1]$. Perhaps try to prove the "at least one" can be replaced by "at most one". Notice this "at most one" statement does not hold when $Y$ is a sphere. –  Ryan Budney Jun 20 '11 at 23:00
    
@Ryan Budney: would you care to take a look at the answer I posted regarding the proof of the statement? I got the idea from your comment. –  Andy Jul 14 '11 at 15:35

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Thanks to Ryan's comment I was able to do the following, I would appreciate it if anyone pointed out any mistakes or gaps in this proof:

let $\pi(Y): (Y\times [0,1]) \to c(Y)$ the quotient projection; if we remove the point $Y\times \{0\}$ (which we'll call the vertex $v$ of the cone), we have that $c(Y)\setminus \{v\}$ is homeomorphic to $Y \times (0,1]$, since $\pi$ is an open bijection.

$Y \times (0,1]$ retracts on $Y \times \{1\}$ (this is actually a deformation retract), since $F((y,t),s) = (y,1-s+ts)$ is a deformation. Moreover, we have that $Y \times \{1\}$ is homeomorphic to $Y$. Thus we have that $c(Y) \setminus v$ is homotopy equivalent to $Y$, so also the Euler characteristic of the cone minus the vertex is at most 1.

Let's suppose that $c(Y)$ and $c(S^2)$ are homeomorphic and let $g$ be that homeomophism; we also have that $c(Y) \setminus v$ is homeomorphic to $c(S^2)\setminus f(v)$. But $c(S^2) \cong D^3$ ($\cong$ means "is homeomorphic to"), because $g: c(S^2) \to D^2$ such that $g(x,t) = tx$ with $t \in [0,1]$ and $x \in S^2$ is constant on the fibers of the quotient projection, which means that there exists $h: c(S^2) \to D^3$ which is continuous. This is also a bijection and sinche $c(S^2)$ is compact and $D^3$ is T2, $h$ is an homoeomorphism.

At this point we have that $c(Y) \setminus v \cong D^3 \setminus h(g(v))$. If we remove a point from $D^3$, on the other hand, we get that it retracts on its border sphere, which has characteristic $2$, which is absurd.

The case that $h(g(v))$ is on the border of $D^3$ can't present, since there exists a retraction $r: c(Y) \setminus v \to Y \times 1$, which implies the existence of the retraction $hgrg^{-1}h^{-1}: D^3 \setminus h(g(v)) \to h(g(Y \times 1))$, but $h(g(Y \times 1)) \cong Y$, which has non-trivial fundamental group; this is absurd, since the inclusion would induce an injective homomorphism between a trivial group and a non-trivial one ($D^3$ minus a point is contractible).

This concludes the proof.

share|improve this answer
    
This is actually the first time I answer my own question, so I don't really know the policy regarding accepting it as the answer. I would really appreciate it if anyone could tell me if there are any errors here. :) –  Andy Jul 20 '11 at 9:46
2  
I think the proof is correct, you can make it more readable by dropping maps whenever possible. You've come to the conclusion that $Y\simeq Y\times (0,1]\approx D^3\setminus\lbrace*\rbrace$ where $*$ is a point in the disk, $\simeq$ means homotopy equivalent, and $\approx$ means homeomorphic, and $D^3\setminus\lbrace*\rbrace\simeq$ either $\lbrace \mathrm{pt}\rbrace$ if $*\in\mathbb{S}^2$, or $\simeq\mathbb{S}^2$ if $*\in D^3\setminus\mathbb{S}^2.$ –  Olivier Bégassat Jul 25 '11 at 3:54
1  
Thus your surface $Y$ is either homotopy equivalent to the $2$ sphere $\mathbb{S}^2$ and has Euler characteristic $2$, which goes against the hypothesis you've made on $Y$, or it is contractible, which no borderless compact surface is. –  Olivier Bégassat Jul 25 '11 at 3:54

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.